http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21052698 en Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:01:41 EDT Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:01:41 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059341 nate1234 : good one (i dont know how to set the value for RWIN to 13068)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059341 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:06:52 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059282 Jodokast96 : That's a new one to me. Sounds like he forgot what service he was taking the call for. Anyway, here a few links that may help you out.

»www.mydigitallife.info/2007/12/1···ormance/

»www.mydigitallife.info/2007/12/1···ormance/

Found from this search »www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=tu···auto+tun

I only read through them briefly, but it may be that there has been some progress made in changing Vistas settings. Nothing I can see as of yet will let you get things as low as needed, but I don't have a Vista system to test this stuff on either.

You may also want to check over in the »Broadband Tweaks forum to see if anybody there has any suggestions. They were a big help in tracking this problem down when it first surfaced 4 years ago.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059282 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:55:36 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059254 nate1234 : i didn't exactly mean that, but what i meant was "well I can ask" I realize i am too far, and might just get comcast Blast! service... Check my post about bandwidth, is it true.

»Verizon says I can have others bandwith when not in use?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059254 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:48:58 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059231 Jodokast96 : Yes, you can, but really, it won't make any bit of difference. Your speeds aren't slow; they are just not consistant. This is because there are a large number of packets being re-transmitted. There is plenty of throughput to get them from point A to point B, but when the connection has to basically stop to send packets it has already sent, it will cause a very brief drop in speed, kind of like a hiccup. Do it over and over, and you get what you are currently seeing. Want to see that there is nothing wrong with your speeds? Go to »speakeasy.net/speedtest and run one of the tests on the West Coast. You'll see pretty smooth and nearly full speeds.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059231 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:45:05 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059165 nate1234 : well.. i can try...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059165 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:34:44 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059148 Jodokast96 : No, won't make a difference. And you are too far for 7.1.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059148 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:31:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059018 nate1234 : Am i better off going to interleaved connection, maybe it will be faster? maybe 7.1mbps...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21059018 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:04:36 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053477 Jodokast96 : You're lucky it only has only had an effect on you now. See my Joined date? That's when it started for me. Nearly 4 years now. But I still use Win2k, so I have no problem with the workaround. When I first heard about Vista's auto-tuning, I was excited and thought that maybe Verizon was just getting ahead of coming technology. But sadly that wasn't the case.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053477 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:01:53 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053447 nate1234 : why did verizon have to screw up my connection with their fancy hardware.....(not too fancy if you ask me, I just want fios, or something better than 3mbps)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053447 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:54:52 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053439 Jodokast96 : No hope for Vista unfortunately. Under normal circumstances a high RWIN is good for a broadband connection. However when you have a Juniper in the mix, the opposite is true. Up to XP, changing the RWIN isn't much of an issue. However with Vista everything changed and those settings no longer have any effect, and Vista's auto-tuning doesn't compensate.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053439 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:52:19 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053252 nate1234 : The line quality test went well, 16ms ping, and 0% loss, and there is An ERX, one hope before me.... I dont know what i can do to fix it, i have vista... but i do have a netgear wpn824, and a westell 2200 dual-link modem... if that helps]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053252 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:17:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053153 nate1234 : Ok to the line quality test, but a big "huh?" to the rest...

I am on vista, but with vista my speeds were fine until recently...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053153 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:58:10 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053150 Jodokast96 : See my above post. Jumpy "tachs" are a good indication of what I described.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053150 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:58:00 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053144 nate1234 : I did do the speakeasy NY test, the "tachometer" was shakey, and it only got to 2200kbps, I used to get 2800-3100kbpbs, any server.... this is a new indecent. All of those servers are different...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053144 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:56:37 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053142 Jodokast96 : It's a good 'ole Juniper. Anyone want to place bets? :D Run a Line Quality Test. If at the last or second to last hop there is an ERX in the router name, you are on a Juniper. Drop your RWIN down to 13068 and your speeds will normalize. If however you are running Windows Vista, you are out of luck.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053142 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:56:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053059 JohnA :
Speedtests should always come from the closest reliable test server. They are only a subjective measure of your getting what you're paying for, and subject to the congestion of the internet. Go straight to »www.speakeasy.com and select the NY server.

2440/700 is not bad, considering another 1000' or 2000' could push you down to a 1.5M provision. I apologize for my optimism on the download. I often forget I was on 3300', and not 10,000'.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053059 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:41:08 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052988 Smith6612 : Try testing to another server and post up the result. If the moving ball or the tachometer is very jittery/freezes/stalls, you might want to post about this issue in the Verizon Direct forum so they can see what is going on before things get worse, if another nearby server and a west coast server show the same inconsistent results and/or a non-steady "ball" or tachometer. Otherwise, the upload and latency is fine.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052988 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:30:15 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052948 nate1234 : I have no downloads going, all other networked devices are off, and this is a new problem]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052948 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:24:16 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052906 nate1234 :







]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052906 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:18:07 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052903 nate1234 : nope, i test much lower (dl), and it was not consistent. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052903 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:17:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052888 JohnA :
Nothing wrong with that line or modem. Stats are good for over 12,000'. I'm guessing you can test about 2800/710 kbps, which is good. No software needed installed, as the 2100 is a modem only, and your connection is DHCP]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052888 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:15:51 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052861 Smith6612 : Trace to nyc.speakeasy.net or dslreports.com . Those should give good results.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052861 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:10:28 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052857 nate1234 : yea, I will post that, what should i trace to?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052857 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:09:26 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052837 Smith6612 : There is no speed benefit to a newer modem unless the newer modem is ADSL2+ compatible, the DSLAM can do ADSL2/ADSL2+ and your line is marginal. Also the below thread will explain everything you need to know about FastPath. Otherwise, your line is in good shape as it is with the 2200 with a good margin, proper sync and with FastPath. If you want, you can post up a speed test and a trace route for us. One thing though, I'm wondering if something is attenuating the downstream a little bit as your upstream attenuation seems to be a bit low compared to your downstream.

»Need to switch between Interleave and FastPath? Part 2]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052837 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:05:39 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052698 nate1234 : I have the 3mbps dsl service, and the westell 2200. Is it worth getting verizon to send me the newest modem? Will I see a speed increase? Also, what is fastpath?

My modem stats are as follows:

Transceiver Revision: 7.1.254
Vendor ID Code: 4
Line Mode: G.DMT-Mode
Data Path: Fast
Transceiver Information Down Stream Path Up Stream Path
DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec) 3360 864
Margin (db) 15.5 12.0
Line Attenuation (db) 49.0 18.5
Transmit Power (db/Hz) 7.0 11.0

I dont know if these are good, but could i get faster speed if I switch from fastpath (which i think i have because the path says it is fast) Verizon says I cant get 7.1, but i really want it.

Also, recently when doing a speed test, it jumps all over(900-1500kbps), and is usually at about 2000kbps. My upload speed dosent jump, and is at about 700-750kbps. Same, slow results from verizons speedtest, and I will post a speetest.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21052698 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:38:51 EDT