<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Unconscionable? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21056102</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:14:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:14:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Unconscionable?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21056102</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><b>Doctor Four</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Garius <A HREF="/useremail/u/618649"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Isn't there a such thing as an unconscionable contract?  Whereas a contract can legally be deemed void if a court reads the thing and realizes that's it so one-sided as to be ridiculous?  The original wording makes it nearly parody.<br> </div>A Washington State judge ruled AT&T's contract unconscionable,<br>saying that it went against several State consumer protection statutes.<br><br>One sided agreements such as this are practically <br>unenforceable, and when challenged in court like AT&T's<br>was, they usually fail entirely.<br><small>--<br>"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21056102</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:03:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Unconscionable?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21055606</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/618649"><b>Garius</b></A> : Isn't there a such thing as an unconscionable contract?  Whereas a contract can legally be deemed void if a court reads the thing and realizes that's it so one-sided as to be ridiculous?  The original wording makes it nearly parody.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21055606</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:26:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
