<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Facebook &#x26; other social sites giving up web design to state in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21061378</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:27:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:27:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Facebook &#x26; other social sites giving up web design to state</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21062890</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/552990"><b>insomniac84</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  GOLFnSUN <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>The state is deciding HOW reporting is going to be done and not the web site. And deciding HOW the web page is setup to meet the states requirements. <br> </div>But it is not a requirement.  How is this any different than if these sites got together and made their own standardize reporting link and information?  And a button for complaining only has power if people use it in a sad attempt to control other people.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21062890</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:58:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Facebook &#x26; other social sites giving up web design to state</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21062862</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>GOLFnSUN</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  insomniac84 <A HREF="/useremail/u/552990"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I fail to see where government control comes into play.  This is optional and is only meant to standardize the way abuse reporting is handled across multiple social networking sites.  The social networking sites still have full control over what they decide is inappropriate.<br>And if you have ever click the hey mods button to complain about someone else on this site, you should love anything that makes it easier to complain.<br> </div>The state is deciding HOW reporting is going to be done and not the web site. And deciding HOW the web page is setup to meet the states requirements. <br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21062862</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:54:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Facebook &#x26; other social sites giving up web design to state</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21062725</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/552990"><b>insomniac84</b></A> : I fail to see where government control comes into play.  This is optional and is only meant to standardize the way abuse reporting is handled across multiple social networking sites.  The social networking sites still have full control over what they decide is inappropriate.<br>And if you have ever click the hey mods button to complain about someone else on this site, you should love anything that makes it easier to complain.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21062725</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:36:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Facebook &#x26; other social sites giving up web design to state</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21061378</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>GOLFnSUN</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080904/ap_on_hi_te/internet_safety" >news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080904/ap_&middot;&middot;&middot;t_safety</A><br><div class="bquote">The popular social networking Web site Facebook has agreed to test replacing its own link for reporting abuse with a bigger one developed by the New Jersey Attorney General's Office.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nj.gov/oag/reportabuse/" >www.nj.gov/oag/reportabuse/</A><br><br>Under the agreement announced Wednesday, Facebook will display a "Report Abuse!" icon on a small fraction of its pages that display videos instead of its own link for reporting objectionable material.<br><br>The test will involve at least 1.5 million randomly-selected page impressions over the next six months.<br><br>At the conclusion of the test, Facebook will work with the New Jersey Attorney General's Office to decide whether to expand, revise or discontinue use of the icon.<br><br>In May, Palo Alto, Calif.-based Facebook agreed to add 40 new safeguards to protect users from cyberbullies and sexual predators following talks with 49 state attorneys general.<br><br>Seven other social networking sites have agreed to use the "Report Abuse!" icon including Blackplanet.com and Myyearbook.com. Sites that display the icon must agree to provide quick responses once problems are reported, and to have a way for a complainant to block future posts from the offending individual.</div> NJ is one of the most liberal states in the country leading the way to more and more gov't control over the internet.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21061378</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:20:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
