sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail  :I wonder if there is some financial reason for the switch. I'm sure that for the Olympics, Silverlight had the following advantages:
-publicity for MS (ie: you need to go install the thing and then the installed base of silverlight rises a bit since the Olympics are so popular)
-MS probably paid for a ton of equipment and possibly even had a hand in the networking side of things (who else would you trust to roll out a CDN for a new technology like this, especially when it's the Olypmics)?
-Since the network might have got hammered, restricting viewing to only those with Silverlight might have let them worry less about scaling things up. I'm sure the Silverlight "restriction" turned a large number of viewers away).
-Moving back to flash simply gives them more eyeballs, which they apparently really want.
As for Flash "failing", this is likely the result of a seasonal sport, continued speed increases at the consumer's end, and generally poor capacity planning. I used to have a friend at MLB.com, and he noted that each new season was always a bit of a surprise. |
