<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>From tethering on AT&#x26;T EDGE to ISDN? in ISDN</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21071396</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:34:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:34:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: From tethering on AT&#x26;T EDGE to ISDN?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21079735</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/317310"><b>wierdo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jlsamsel <A HREF="/useremail/u/1387105"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>One bar off from perfect on most days, but if it's rainy or foggy, might only pick up one or two bars.<br> </div>That's not particularly good signal, although you might be able to improve things with an external antenna.<br><br>I have a friend who lives up on a hill maybe about a mile away from an at&t site. I can easily pull 200Kbps when I'm at his house. Web browsing is still basically like using a modem.<br><small>--<br>It's w<i>ie</i>rdo, not w<i>ei</i>rdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21079735</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:51:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: From tethering on AT&#x26;T EDGE to ISDN?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21073019</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1387105"><b>jlsamsel</b></A> : One bar off from perfect on most days, but if it's rainy or foggy, might only pick up one or two bars.<br><br>Bigger downloads will sometimes cancel themselves out, but I think that's when it reaches it's higher speeds. Youtube-ing has to load about 30 seconds at a time to watch 5 seconds worth of clips so that's very frustrating! <br><small>--<br>Hulloooo, Zeba Neighba...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21073019</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:21:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: From tethering on AT&#x26;T EDGE to ISDN?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21072206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/317310"><b>wierdo</b></A> : Experience with both (although not at the same time, I haven't had ISDN in years) tells me that for most all uses, ISDN will be better than tethering with EDGE.<br><br>It's possible, if you have an excellent signal, that a bulk transfer would be faster on EDGE, but its interactive performance is quite poor due to the high latency.<br><small>--<br>It's w<i>ie</i>rdo, not w<i>ei</i>rdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21072206</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:49:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>From tethering on AT&#x26;T EDGE to ISDN?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071396</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1387105"><b>jlsamsel</b></A> : Has anyone went from using AT&T's EDGE to ISDN? The download speeds would supposedly be slower (around 220 kbps on EDGE), but I dunno with pings being in the 500's, I'm betting ISDN would make it seem snappier. And it would be a constant connection (getting alot of time-outs with tethering) as EDGE seems to come and go.<br><small>--<br>Hulloooo, Zeba Neighba...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071396</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:40:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
