http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21071704 en Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:24:13 EDT Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:24:13 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21073310 Gbcue : It's only 750 million for the first 6 months - promotional price!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21073310 Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:17:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071815 EPS : Ah, but the difference is when telcos/cablecos bundle it makes them more money, but if the D block albatross had been hung around the C block's neck, it would have made them less money... and they'd probably have to get rid of the much ballyhooed "open access" provision to get even a halfway decent price.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071815 Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:17:08 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071704 anon : Heh - yep. Then the FCC could have just told them - "Well guys, trust us, bundling them makes it CHEAPER for you! Why if we had to sell these two separately we'd have to, positively HAVE to, charge you so much for each that you'd never want to buy both - which we want you to do. Then if we couldn't sell you the D block it would go away and limit your choices! You don't want to stifle bidder choices do you? That's why bundling is really in your best interest." ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071704 Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:08:00 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071277 luckylar : Dumb FCC they should have played by the Teleco and Cable rules... Bundled D WITH C... bet the bidders would have whined like babies!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21071277 Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:12:20 EDT