site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

4 edits

reply to fAcEtIOUs

Re: There are some non-partisan groups that agree with FCC order

said by fAcEtIOUs:

quote:
Of course everyone but the baby bells is arguing that this "regulatory underbrush" was providing data that would, were the FCC to actually make decisions based on data and not party or corporate loyalty, prove useful.
Not everyone:
»www.marketwatch.com/news/story/i···ist=hppr
The Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI) applauds the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) announcement Saturday that it will abandon the outdated and discriminatory ARMIS reporting requirements.

In comments filed with the Commission last week, director of the IPI Center for Technology Freedom Bartlett Cleland said these regulatory requirements applied only to a tiny portion of the communications industry, distorted the marketplace with irrelevant data and hindered the deployment of the best products and services to consumers.

Regulatory policy should be technologically neutral, says Cleland, and by ending the requirements for ARMIS reporting, the Commission will level the playing field for those in the marketplace.

When the ARMIS reports were first created they were said to be temporary, and yet, 18 years later, they continued to be required for only a handful of those who competed in the wireline communications marketplace.

"Even if this information had been collected broadly from the vast and rapidly changing communications industry, the fact is that the goal in collecting the information had long since been achieved," said Cleland.

In addition, both the states and FCC itself broadly collected similar data already, and the free market also already provided a more consumer friendly and accessible report.
The Institute for Policy Innovation is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan public policy organization based in Dallas, Texas.
»www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?ti···novation

quote:
The conservative Capital Research Center ranked IPI as amongst the most conservative groups in the US, scoring it as an eight on a scale of one to eight. [2] (Pdf)
Why are you keep spreading your LIES, TJunk?

»www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnf···b016.htm

quote:
Peter Ferrara, a senior policy adviser at the conservative Institute for Policy Innovation, says he, too, took money from Abramoff to write op-ed pieces boosting the lobbyist's clients. "I do that all the time," Ferrara says. "I've done that in the past, and I'll do it in the future."
»www.prwatch.org/node/4298
The Institute for Policy Innovation's Peter Ferrara also wrote "pay for play" columns for Abramoff, but, unlike Bandow, he isn't remorseful. "I've done it in the past, and I'll do it in the future," Ferrara said. Ferrara's boss also says the arrangement isn't "wrong or unethical." None of the columns contained any disclosure. BusinessWeek noted that the columns "provided a seemingly independent validation of the arguments the Abramoff team were using to try to sway Congressional action."

About the level of corruption: »www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?ti···_Funding

Payola-world: »www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?ti···t_Payola

There you go - this is just another typical BS-spewing, indie-faking hardcore neocon-Republican-sponsored lying sack of shit lobby group... now wonder they applaud everything without a single brain cell that goes towards unchecked corporate power.

--
said by bicker:

Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true.


S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

reply to kamm

Re: There are some non-partisan groups that agree with FCC order

said by kamm See ProfileThere you go - this is just another typical BS-spewing, indie-faking hardcore neocon-Republican-sponsored lying sack of shit lobby group... now wonder they applaud everything without a single brain cell that goes towards unchecked corporate power.

[/BQUOTE :


Neo-con...did you learn a new word?
Why is it you think half of this country has "Neo-con" beliefs? (Hint: it's got to do with the children)
Do you believe Move-on.org is a liberal sack of shit lobby group?
If not, then your just as biased as you accuse others of being!

Wednesday, 30-May 11:12:11 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics