<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Trapped by crappy ISPs in Detroit 48206&#x27; in forum &#x27;Michigan&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21078173</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:54:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:54:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Trapped by crappy ISPs in Detroit 48206</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21097704</link>
<description><![CDATA[grtgonzo posted : I'm in a similar situation in that AT&T will only give me 384K dsl at my location. I've been stuck on it for years, but don't want to go the Comcast route. <br><br>I don't live in thee sticks. You would think that in a town of 70,000 people in a Metro area of 3 million plus that they cold do better.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21097704</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:49:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Trapped by crappy ISPs in Detroit 48206</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21094570</link>
<description><![CDATA[burgermeister posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/619653" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=619653');">rcrodgers</a>:</small><br><br>Yes, that was my first action, but the problem is generally that any DSL provider in the area will be using AT&T's lines, on which I'm still limited to their 512kbps downstream.<br> </div>You know, that's true, but what was really odd when I got DSL is Covad was the only company I could get it through.  For some reason, AT&T couldn't do it.<br><br>Maybe they just didn't have the equipment set up in my area, but that seems a bit hard to believe.<br><small>--<br>"I've learned that depression is merely anger without enthusiasm."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21094570</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:10:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Trapped by crappy ISPs in Detroit 48206</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21085269</link>
<description><![CDATA[LBDSL posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/619653" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=619653');">rcrodgers</a>:</small><br><br>Yes, that was my first action, but the problem is generally that any DSL provider in the area will be using AT&T's lines, on which I'm still limited to their 512kbps downstream.<br> </div>that is incorrect<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://LBTech.com">Lightning Bolt Technologies</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21085269</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:07:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Trapped by crappy ISPs in Detroit 48206</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21085261</link>
<description><![CDATA[rcrodgers posted : Yes, that was my first action, but the problem is generally that any DSL provider in the area will be using AT&T's lines, on which I'm still limited to their 512kbps downstream.<br><br>Are there any other fiber/fibre optic providers other than Verizon and possibly AT&T?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21085261</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:06:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Trapped by crappy ISPs in Detroit 48206</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21084854</link>
<description><![CDATA[LBDSL posted : have you checked here &raquo;<A HREF="/search">/search</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21084854</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:54:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Trapped by crappy ISPs in Detroit 48206</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21078173</link>
<description><![CDATA[rcrodgers posted : Ok, I moved [back] to Detroit, in the 48206 zip code a few months back, and discovered that my parents had DSL. Yay! (Or so I cheered initially.) It turns out the AT&T DSL for whatever reason is limited to 512kbps downstream, and can't be upgraded. AT&T claims that their system doesn't have any more available capacity for them to "switch my port" to. Given the modern era, and the fact that I had friends working with Pac Bell years ago, I accepted this answer with tongue in cheek and subscribed to Comcast's cable modem service, which up until the start of August was great.<br><br>Then Comcast started blocking my access to SMTP servers on port 25, followed by blocking my access to my company's VPN (I work remotely), and they claim that if I want these services I need to be on a commercial account.  I told them what I would be doing when I signed up, mind you.<br><br>So, I'm getting ready to detonate the bridge between me and Comcast, and can't bear to deal with the slow speed on AT&T's DSL. Do I have any alternatives other than HughesNet here? Verizon doesn't seem to be offering Fios in my neighborhood unfortunately, and U-verse hasn't made its way over here either...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Trapped-by-crappy-ISPs-in-Detroit-48206-21078173</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:27:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

