ArgMeMatey
join:2001-08-09
Milwaukee, WI
 ·AT&T Midwest
| Re: Caller ID testing site here Thanks for posting this. I've been looking for a service like this for a long time.
Cavalier had the wrong name on my secondary line. Otherwise both Cavalier and Verizon were OK. These were with POTS lines. I will try my VoIP when I am at home.
The Vonage number answered with a modem tone the first and third times and a voicemail system the second time. So, no indication of how their service is working.
--
USNG:
16TDN2870
Find your Lat-Long:
Geocoder | |
|
 trim
join:2003-08-12
| Re: Caller ID testing site here said by ArgMeMatey  :Thanks for posting this. I've been looking for a service like this for a long time. Cavalier had the wrong name on my secondary line. Otherwise both Cavalier and Verizon were OK. These were with POTS lines. I will try my VoIP when I am at home. The Vonage number answered with a modem tone the first and third times and a voicemail system the second time. So, no indication of how their service is working. yeah I noticed my original AT&T ported to Sunrocket, and now to Ooma still shows the OLD caller ID name on Cavalier... (which is my father's name)
And on verizon, it shows "Unavailable"
Not sure if it is accurate, but I called a business number and my new Caller CNAME shows..
Not sure if its correct or not. | |
|
 | voipMatt
join:2008-07-30
Birmingham, AL | Re: Caller ID testing site here x2 Thanks for the post.
But I would expect some "Unavailable" replies.... due to dipping for CNAM cost $ per dip. | |
|
| | trim
join:2003-08-12
| Re: Caller ID testing site here said by voipMatt :x2 Thanks for the post. But I would expect some "Unavailable" replies.... due to dipping for CNAM cost $ per dip. not quite understanding your post.. do you mean VOIP incur more charges for CNAME? | |
|
| | | voipMatt
join:2008-07-30
Birmingham, AL
| Re: Caller ID testing site here Ultimately its the terminating carrier that should "dip" or pull the CNAME record for the number calling.... However some carriers do not do this, as each time they dip, it cost money.
My point was CNAME is not free from a service provider's standpoint. | |
|
|
|
|
