dcurrey
Premium
join:2004-06-29 | reply to Karl Bode
Re: This is opposite of power boost... power throttle
Ummm does that translate to "Our network is crappy and can't handle the BS speeds and services you are paying for" |
|
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02 | reply to en102
Yeah, I get what you're saying, yes.
Adaptive bandwidth based on HD's QoS needs, being marketed in reverse. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
1 edit | reply to Karl Bode
Well, according to some reading on utalk.att.com
They're pushing for a more 'variable' data rate, on the VDSL side using QoS vs. fixed rate channels (see slide show page 11 »www.oecd.org/dataoecd/36/23/40460750.pdf )
Sort of like power boost in reverse as a poor analogy.
I think the 'glass half full' (i.e. 6Mbps boostable to 10) sells easier than 10Mbps throttling back to 6Mbps 'glass half empty' approach. But that's just me.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
4 edits | reply to en102
No. Again, they're making reference to the fact that a user on a 10Mbps U-Verse tier may be pushed back to 6Mbps if his/her line can't handle cramming the dual streams in there. They aren't actually throttling back speeds as part of a new network management routine aimed at tackling P2P.
The "temporarily reduced" bit is simply warning users that they may see reduced throughput if HD is gobbling up all of the available bandwidth since HD is going to have QOS priority over Internet data....
I agree the wording is confusing (Shite even, as my friend from Wales would say), but they're not talking about new traffic management. I think some lawyer probably tried too hard to explain the limitations of cramming HD over VDSL without having to actually admit that their choice of VDSL has limitations.
Filter truth through a team of lawyers and marketing people and you 'll usually get gobbledygook... |
|
