NormanSPremium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4 Reviews:
 ·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to Lazlow
Re: Oddly, increased deployment of cheap tiers hurts our aver. Probably 80% of the population of Japan lives in cities, with as much as 60% in the larger cities. The largest cities are on the Kanto plain (Tokyo, Yokohama) and on the Kansai plain (Kyoto, Osaka). Only as far apart as San Francisco from Los Angeles, in California. Move 80% of the U.S. population to those two cities, and suddenly 100/100 Internet will be economically feasible in the U.S.A.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
Lazlow
join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
1 edit | The lines running city to city part of the equation is not the problem. It is within city (node to home, etc) that is the problem. While the density argument is somewhat appropriate, it not nearly as applicable when comparing our cities to their cities. The density differences (their cities to ours) is just not that great. Certainly not enough to account for 100/100 (there) being the same price as 5/512(here). |
|
NormanSPremium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by Lazlow:The lines running city to city part of the equation is not the problem. It is within city (node to home, etc) that is the problem. While the density argument is somewhat appropriate, it not nearly as applicable when comparing our cities to their cities. The density differences (their cities to ours) is just not that great. Certainly not enough to account for 100/100 (there) being the same price as 5/512(here). Ah. I see. There are as many people in the S.F. Bay Area as on the Kanto plain of Japan (surrounding S.F. and Tokyo Bays); as many people in Greater Los Angeles as on the Kansai plain (Kyoto, Kobe, Osaka). Gotcha!
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
