 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18
2 edits | reply to Dogfather
Re: ATT better watch out said by Dogfather:Yeah but doesn't AT&T have more HSI subs than Comcast and AT&T only got beat in adds by Comcast when AT&T doubled their intro rates. No idea.
This I found interesting posted above:
"While the company did add 46,000 subscribers total due to U-Verse, they actually lost 90,000 DSL subscribers thanks to the economy, competition, and according to Donovan - flawed execution."
For a net loss of 44,000?
See, some of us look for value in the service(s) we get - and services vary by area.
Bang-For-Buck, here, goes to Comcast.
AT&T here is a whopping 6mbps of you are close enough.
$35 upto 6mbps... no POTS so we get to add that, right?
"SERVICE REQUIRES: DSL modem/gateway/router and qualifying local service from AT&T at time of online order."
$35 and POTS... 
»www.att.com/Common/indc/popup/in···ions.htm
"Guaranteed Price for 24 Months: Price guarantee applies to monthly recurring charge for a period of 24 months from date of service, and does not include taxes, fees or excessive bandwidth usage charges."
WTF?
Yeah... Gots to gets me some of that. 
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
 DogfatherPremium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
2 edits | Value is based on what you're using it for. Comcast got me for $56 for basic HSI unbundled ( the awesome 30% how dare you not have CATV penalty) when I had them. I used to be a Comcast sub so I know they nightmare they were but I've never had AT&T DSL (I had AT&T Broadband which was great before the Comcast nightmare came to town, they didn't have bundling penalties). |
|
|
|
dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18
1 edit | Here, POTS used to be SBC.
Sucked the Big Red one!
SBC bought AT&T and renamed themselves to AT&T - still the same crap lines here.
So, since *HERE* AT&T(SBC) sucked too bad to be sucky, AT&T is not going to happen.
No Uverse, and no chance of FiOS, but Comcast hooked this Wood up with Blast anyways - at no additional cost. Uhm... yeah! 
So, as I sit here typing these posts to y'all, it's coming across a far better service provider than what is now AT&T.
See that little image and link above - WTF is "excessive bandwidth usage charges"?
AT&T? El Capo?
Hop on in the SS CapMyLine. We'll all go for a cruise around The Bay! 
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
DogfatherPremium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
3 edits | Someone would have to search far and wide to find POTS that isn't a total rip-off.
You didn't hear about AT&T's new plans? They're going the cap route AND apparently are going to charge overage fees!
I guess doubling the price of intro DSL didn't lose them enough customers. |
|
 koma3504AdvocatePremium
join:2004-06-22
North Richland Hills, TX | reply to dadkins
excessive bandwidth usage charges
yea what is this and what is the limit ???
I like how they d
Looks like Ill be re-adding another dsl line to my house so I can be sure to avoid this.
I wonder how they will do this for Uverse users since TV runs over ip and uses bandwith. And you can record up to 4 streas at anyone time.
--
† Koma †
If YOu Don't Think It's Possable!! It's Acually A Reality!!The best way to predict the future is to invent it. Alan Kay!!
Ya Don't Know The signal Till Ya Ride It!!
Voice Break's There's Trouble!!!! |
|
