 rudnickePremium join:2004-10-23 Rantoul, IL kudos:1 | Oh great! Guess I better enjoy my games before Google starts injecting ads into them. |
|
 DaMaGeINCThe Lan ManPremium join:2002-06-08 Greenville, SC kudos:2 1 edit | Google is good. Stop your whining. Would you rather Yahoo or EA buy Valve???? |
|
 drewAutomaticPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 Reviews:
·wavebroadband
| reply to rudnicke interesting. the platform only took off due to the popularity of counterstrike back then. I used it. I hated it. I will likely never purchase another game from that system again. Too many problems with not being able to play in a LAN setting if there was no internet.
However, I do wonder why they didn't approach the Penny Arcade online distribution platform. It's named something with "green" in the title. -- Come play Mafia! |
|
 PaulgDisplaced YooperPremium join:2004-03-15 Neenah, WI kudos:1 | reply to DaMaGeINC if thats the choice we have, EA or google... hope to god for google.
EA sucks. |
|
 | reply to DaMaGeINC I would rather have Yahoo then Google, but EA? EA = NOWAY |
|
 DaMaGeINCThe Lan ManPremium join:2002-06-08 Greenville, SC kudos:2 | Yahoo over Google?????? WHAT!!!!!!!!!! Please tell me you are not going to have any kids! |
|
 dsldude08Premium,VIP join:2008-01-03 La Crosse, WI kudos:2 | lol |
|
 spewakR.I.P DadkinsPremium join:2001-08-07 Elk Grove, CA kudos:1 Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
| reply to rudnicke said by rudnicke:Guess I better enjoy my games before Google starts injecting ads into them. Oh, Google will inject something into them alright!  -- The weekend is here, grab a can of beer! |
|
 | reply to rudnicke I would also like to go with google.
I just hope that they don't change anything and keep everything the way it is. -- Noobgamers.com |
|
 | reply to Paulg I guess I like Command and Conquer to much. I also seem to remember some other EA games I liked (to old to remember). So I guess I disagree that EA sucks. |
|
|
|
 dnoyeBFerrous Phallus join:2000-10-09 Southfield, MI | reply to drew Me too. I like Half-Life 2. I put up with Steam because I was forced too. I hate it, and it has kept me from following Half-Life into many of its subsequent additions and enhancements. I love the idea of something to prevent hacking so we can have a fair game. But I can't stand all the junk with Steam.
Plus I paid for my game and I still have to watch Steam adds for more games. Its offensive.
I can't stand installers putting icons on my desktop without asking, I certainly can't stand the way Steam injects itself into my experience. -- dnoyeB "Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16
|
|
 | reply to viperlmw I like command and conquer also. Every game i have purchased so far has not had any drm. Hopefully Red Alert 3 will be the same way... And i don't think Google buying valve is a bad thing at all. |
|
 axus join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC | reply to DaMaGeINC Google isn't always good, and they can always get worse. Nobody starts out intending to be a monopoly that behaves badly. |
|
 | reply to inurenegade Nope, your SCREWED. EA is polluting Red Alert 3 with the same DRM garbage BS that they put into Spore. I was in the beta, and as soon as I heard that, I uninstalled it. I'm done with EA's crap. |
|
 2 edits | reply to dnoyeB said by dnoyeB:Plus I paid for my game and I still have to watch Steam adds for more games. Its offensive. I can't stand installers putting icons on my desktop without asking, I certainly can't stand the way Steam injects itself into my experience. What ads are you referring to?? I have Steam running on my system 24/7 for the last 4 years and not once have I ever seen an ad. There is the Steam Update News page that sometimes pops up when starting Steam that shows any newly added games or sales which can be turned off within the settings menu. A page that sometimes pops up to inform you of newly available games hardly counts as invasive advertising. Also you can set Steam to go directly to your games list when it starts instead of the store page, again in the settings menu. Every time I have installed a game with Steam (that would be hundreds of times at this point) the last thing that happens at the end of every install, without a single exception, is it asks "Would you like Steam to place a shortcut on your desktop?" at which point you can say no. It's amazing how much better software works when you learn how to use it and pay attention to what it's doing and what it's asking you. |
|
 | reply to DaMaGeINC Why does anyone have to buy them? If they are successful why can't they just continue on their own? |
|
 Combat ChuckToo Many CannibalsPremium join:2001-11-29 Erie, PA | reply to anonnnnnn EA has been playing relatively nicely recently. EA also doesn't have a record of your whole life down to what commercial you get up to drop a deuce while you watch Lost. I'd rather have EA.
Either way, I seriously doubt this is at all true at this point. It would be more believable if it were Microsoft. |
|
 | reply to rudnicke as long as the ads being added into games fit the theme and feel of the game and are not obtrusive (no ads should alter the game play to make it easier or harder and no gigantic ads that cover walls), i probably wouldn't mind too much. i think it would be pretty hard to add ads to the hl2 universe or tf2 without destroying the feel, but CS seems more plausible. instead of generic computers, why not a computer by a real brand? would gun manufactures pay to push their guns into CS? instead of generic bottles and cans, why not coke or bud or smirnoff?
could be pretty interesting if the ads get hacked or adult orientated ads get mixed in, could lead for some interesting reactions. |
|
 FiLPremium join:2005-08-16 Silver Spring, MD | reply to viperlmw most of the better C&C games came out when EA wasn't the franchise owner. |
|
 Cune join:2005-06-02 West Des Moines, IA | reply to Combat Chuck Microsoft had their chance and passed on them. So did Yahoo. |
|