http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21129975 en Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:22:01 EDT Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:22:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21129975 kpr92400 : I like my 24-135 on my crop body...I could "upgrade" to some "better" lenses in the 24-70 or 28-80 range but I'd lose a lot of telephoto. Maybe someday if I get more megapixels.

What would be really interesting is if C&N introduced CCD-shift anti-shake that could work with or without the IS/VR in the lenses... They probably won't do that though, too much margin when you make people buy the IS/VR in all their lenses.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21129975 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:01:04 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21068954 Rubicon : I just got my 18-200mm couple months ago and seems to be good. I'm surprised that Nikon released 18-105mm lens because the segment appears to be saturated; 18-55mm VR, 16-85mm VR, 18-200mm VR and now 18-105mm VR.

All of which would work great for kit or walkaround lens - not to mention the 3rd party introducing 'VC' zooms, too, but I'd like to see an 17-55mm DX get a little VR treatment :D
--
R u b i c o n]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21068954 Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:08:17 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21048204 gugarci : In case anyone is interested.
»www.slrgear.com/reviews/showprod···1/cat/13]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21048204 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:15:12 EDT