site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
575
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:2

RIAA should be sued..

For abusing our legal system.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by Rob:

For abusing our legal system.
The RIAA is not the only party guilty of this sort of activity.

The entire civil legal system in the USA needs reform to prevent this sort of abuse. We can start by mandating that winning civil lawsuits requires the same burden of proof that is required for a conviction in a criminal case. That is, a defendant is presumed "not liable" until he or she is proved liable by way of evidence that meets the "beyond a reasonable doubt" legal definition.
--
"At the moment of conception."

SixSpeed

join:2001-12-24
USA
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS

reply to Rob

said by Rob:

For abusing our legal system.
The RIAA bought and paid for our legal system to be manipulated and changed in their favor by way or payoff, lobbyist dollars and pandering to politico's.

The RIAA and politicians who took their money should be investigated and outed. The lawyer should start that movement in retaliation.


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA

reply to pnh102

said by pnh102:

We can start by mandating that winning civil lawsuits requires the same burden of proof that is required for a conviction in a criminal case. That is, a defendant is presumed "not liable" until he or she is proved liable by way of evidence that meets the "beyond a reasonable doubt" legal definition.
Good luck with getting preponderance of the evidence ratcheted up to beyond a reasonable doubt. The deal is all but signed by the Senate to have the U.S. Atty General bring **AA copyright suits against alleged infringers. Oh, and if the $enate pa$$e$ this bill, our tax dollars will finance the lawsuits . On behalf of the **AAs.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley


ztmike
Mark for moderation
Premium
join:2001-08-02
Michigan City, IN

reply to Rob

said by Rob:

For abusing our legal system.
LOL the RIAA has no case. What a fucking waste of our court time.
--
ZZPERFORMANCE

Joe12345678

join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL

reply to major marco
DOJ enforce civil copyright claims will push it to "beyond a reasonable doubt" as well the right of jury trial



TCub
Premium
join:2008-09-03
Olmsted Falls, OH
kudos:4

reply to Rob
Haha RIAA 0 United States Internet Users 1.

How could they possibly find it out to try to punish someone for blogging about how what they do isn't necessary?



major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA

reply to Joe12345678

said by Joe12345678:

DOJ enforce civil copyright claims will push it to "beyond a reasonable doubt" as well the right of jury trial
And if you buy that then I have some beautiful ocean front property for you in Nebraska.

Notwithstanding your naivete, these cases won't be converted from civil to criminal...if you read the substance of the bill in question, you'll see that they will -in fact- remain in civil court, except the **AAs want the DoJ to bring suit and police their alleged copyrights for them. Nothing changes but for the fact the **AAs questionable suits will now be financed on the taxpayer dime instead of their own.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley

Wednesday, 30-May 11:18:31 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics