Re: They were already down to 2GB/mo in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21131325 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:23:31 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:23:31 EDT Re: They were already down to 2GB/mo http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21323014 Akelvin : Declining interest you say? Not so, and you know it. Besides, it's clear that you aren't the target audience for Usenet which has always stood for the free exchange of information in a non-monitored environment.

Don't get me wrong, blogs are fine and communication tools are being created every day to cater to just about every personal need. However, what they all lack is the true feeling of privacy and protection in support of "Free Speech."

Personally, I feel that with each nook and corner being exploited for profit, the once enjoyed anonymity that the Internet use to provide no longer exists. To me, Usenet is the last vestige of a true form of "Free" information exchange, while everyone is simply waiting for this too to become property of "The Man." Enjoy it while it lasts. :(

***Always keep your pockets free of margarine...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21323014 Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:21:08 EDT Re: They were already down to 2GB/mo http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21132116 Aimhere :
said by Usenetter :

Usenet is growing like crazy. Here's a graph showing the news feed over time.

If interest is "declining", then how come more content is posted to it every day?

The "declining" argument is BS.
That graph shows that the the amount of posts per day (in GB) has grown over the years. But I have to point out that there isn't necessarily any correspondence between the amount of posting and the number of people posting.

The amount of posting has increased for two reasons. First, the binary files being posted have grown, both in size and in quantity. Computer executables (apps, games, etc.) have steadily expanded from single-floppy disks (or even smaller) into multi-DVD-ROM monsters, while data files (music and video) have gone from tiny MIDI sequences to multi-megabyte MP3s to multi-gigabyte full-DVD videos. Second, more and more spammers "discovered" Usenet, posting their drivel in every group under the sun, and while their posts are text-only, the sheer number of them adds up.

Posting to Usenet has grown because it's still one of the easiest and cheapest (for the poster) ways to distribute [binary] stuff... no need to buy/rent a permanent server, no need to build a web GUI, nothing to maintain, no DNS registration, etc.; just subscribe to a Usenet service for a few bucks a month. But the number of people actually using Usenet for discussions seems to be steadily dwindling.

Aimhere]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21132116 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:03:11 EDT Re: They were already down to 2GB/mo http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131911 anon : Usenet is growing like crazy. Here's a graph showing the news feed over time.

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Usen···(en).svg

If interest is "declining", then how come more content is posted to it every day?

The "declining" argument is BS.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131911 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:33:28 EDT Re: They were already down to 2GB/mo http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131603 djrobx :
quote:
We had good newservers with ATTBi
AT&T Broadband, in an anti-piracy effort, removed a huge number of binary groups shortly before the Comcast took over. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131603 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:41:19 EDT Re: They were already down to 2GB/mo http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131325 PGHammer : It's not the children (and it's not pr0n, either), but, as the OP said, declining interest. Comcast *never* ran the servers themselves (before switching to Giganews, Excite, then AtHome, ran the newsgroup servers, then, in the interim between Excite and Giganews, Comcast leased access from UUNet). Between declining interest in USENET (almost everything available via USENET is available other ways, most of which are far more bandwidth-friendly), and the cost of service, why should Comcast continue eating $8/customer for a service likely used by less than ten percent of their customers? (As much as I used to use the Comcast/Giganews USENET servers, even I haven't used them in more than six months.) Surprisingly, my interest in USENET has declined with the increase in available/usable bandwidth.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131325 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:43:49 EDT They were already down to 2GB/mo http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21123865 Dogfather :
quote:
This decision is in alignment with other Internet Service Providers

So they did it and we can now cut your services too. Bitchen.

We had good newservers with ATTBi and then Comcast cut us down to 1GB then back up to 2GB/mo. Then our cable system was traded to TWC who also killed NGs. I cancel and go to Verizon FiOS.

Now Verizon did the same thing so if I want the service I used to get included with VZ I have for fork over $15-$25 more a month.

People continue paying more and getting less whether it's these cuts in services or new network management bullshit.

Oh, and F the children who as Carlin pointed out, are always the justification used for crap like this.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21123865 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:55:41 EDT