Re: RIAA should be sued.. in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21133819 en Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:32:35 EDT Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:32:35 EDT Re: RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21133819 major marco :
said by Joe12345678 See Profile :

DOJ enforce civil copyright claims will push it to "beyond a reasonable doubt" as well the right of jury trial
And if you buy that then I have some beautiful ocean front property for you in Nebraska.

Notwithstanding your naivete, these cases won't be converted from civil to criminal...if you read the substance of the bill in question, you'll see that they will -in fact- remain in civil court, except the **AAs want the DoJ to bring suit and police their alleged copyrights for them. Nothing changes but for the fact the **AAs questionable suits will now be financed on the taxpayer dime instead of their own.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21133819 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:04:15 EDT Re: RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21133317 TCub : Haha RIAA 0 United States Internet Users 1.

How could they possibly find it out to try to punish someone for blogging about how what they do isn't necessary?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21133317 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:32:42 EDT Re: RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131887 Joe12345678 : DOJ enforce civil copyright claims will push it to "beyond a reasonable doubt" as well the right of jury trial]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131887 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:31:37 EDT Re: RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131091 ztmike :
said by Rob See Profile :

For abusing our legal system.
LOL the RIAA has no case. What a fucking waste of our court time.
--
ZZPERFORMANCE]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21131091 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:51:55 EDT Re: RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130370 major marco :
said by pnh102 See Profile :

We can start by mandating that winning civil lawsuits requires the same burden of proof that is required for a conviction in a criminal case. That is, a defendant is presumed "not liable" until he or she is proved liable by way of evidence that meets the "beyond a reasonable doubt" legal definition.
Good luck with getting preponderance of the evidence ratcheted up to beyond a reasonable doubt. The deal is all but signed by the Senate to have the U.S. Atty General bring **AA copyright suits against alleged infringers. Oh, and if the $enate pa$$e$ this bill, our tax dollars will finance the lawsuits . On behalf of the **AAs.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130370 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:34:00 EDT Re: RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130189 DVOOR8 :
said by Rob See Profile :

For abusing our legal system.
The RIAA bought and paid for our legal system to be manipulated and changed in their favor by way or payoff, lobbyist dollars and pandering to politico's.

The RIAA and politicians who took their money should be investigated and outed. The lawyer should start that movement in retaliation.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130189 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:56:28 EDT Re: RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130171 pnh102 :
said by Rob See Profile :

For abusing our legal system.
The RIAA is not the only party guilty of this sort of activity.

The entire civil legal system in the USA needs reform to prevent this sort of abuse. We can start by mandating that winning civil lawsuits requires the same burden of proof that is required for a conviction in a criminal case. That is, a defendant is presumed "not liable" until he or she is proved liable by way of evidence that meets the "beyond a reasonable doubt" legal definition.
--
"At the moment of conception."]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130171 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:52:34 EDT RIAA should be sued.. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130061 Rob : For abusing our legal system. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130061 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:32:00 EDT