Re: FAP and CAP - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
nasadude join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD ·Comcast	reply to bobjohnson Re: FAP and CAP said by bobjohnson : What is the issue with the biggest providers wanting to cap and such... they would like to have metered broadband where we pay by the bit, but to do that they first are going to pretend there is a "bandwidth crunch". Because there is a "bandwidth crunch", it's necessary to do all these things to "save" bandwidth. incidentally, this will also allow them to slow down upgrades, eventually making the "bandwidth crunch" a reality as their network fails to keep pace with demand. implementing all these caps and throttles also sets them up for the next step - prioritizing their content over other content. Watch something on Hulu? that's gonna cost ya! on the other hand, you can get this other programming free from the comcast portal! without competition, they do whatever they want.
nasadude join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD ·Comcast	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-20 10:58:11 ·
TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ ·Sprint Mobile Broa.. ·Comcast	said by nasadude : implementing all these caps and throttles also sets them up for the next step - prioritizing their content over other content. Watch something on Hulu? that's gonna cost ya! on the other hand, you can get this other programming free from the comcast portal! They won't do that because it will set off a firestorm of "network neutrality" issues with the FCC and others(including content providers). -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-20 12:08:45 ·
bobjohnson Premium join:2007-02-03 Titusville, FL ·Sprint Mobile Broa.. ·RoadRunner Cable	reply to nasadude said by nasadude : said by bobjohnson : What is the issue with the biggest providers wanting to cap and such... they would like to have metered broadband where we pay by the bit, but to do that they first are going to pretend there is a "bandwidth crunch". Because there is a "bandwidth crunch", it's necessary to do all these things to "save" bandwidth. incidentally, this will also allow them to slow down upgrades, eventually making the "bandwidth crunch" a reality as their network fails to keep pace with demand. implementing all these caps and throttles also sets them up for the next step - prioritizing their content over other content. Watch something on Hulu? that's gonna cost ya! on the other hand, you can get this other programming free from the comcast portal! without competition, they do whatever they want. Ahh... That all makes sense... -- Any unauthorized copying or distribution of the opinion above constitutes stupidity and you should probably be punished
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-09-20 14:27:43 ·


Thursday, 26-Nov 22:26:29	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF