republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast’s Throttling Plans Outlined » FAP and CAP
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Eh, whatever »
« Really?  
AuthorAll Replies


Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
reply to espaeth
Re: FAP and CAP

That's irrelevant. The traffic shaping is always in effect. The only difference is who is traffic shaped and who isn't.

If you have a FAP, a cap is totally unjustified.


espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq

said by Dogfather See Profile :

That's irrelevant. The traffic shaping is always in effect. The only difference is who is traffic shaped and who isn't.
First off, it's not really traffic shaping. If you're a heavy user and you get tagged into the best effort class, your traffic will only be impacted so much as light users are trying to get packets on the network. If you're a heavy user, the channel is getting busy enough to start to implement the tagging, but never actually reaches a point of saturation, there is no impact to anyone's traffic.

Second, this isn't in effect all the time. I suggest you re-read the technical details of the proposal; the requeuing only takes place when the channel reaches a near congested state. The overwhelming majority of the time there is no action taken at all by the system.

It's the solution for 2 distinct problems: reduce the impact by chronic heavy users (CAP), and reduce short term bottlenecks that can occur during times of peak demand (FAP).


Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

That makes zero sense.

The FAP alleviates network traffic issues for casual users. If there is no congestion, then no cap is warranted. If there is network congestion, the FAP is all that is warranted.

IOW, the FAP reduces the impact of chronic heavy users if they're impacting other users and the FAP reduces the impact of extended use during periods of peak demand. The FAP is all that is needed. Caps are unjustified if you already have a fair access policy in effect. If chronic heavy users aren't affecting other users then it shouldn't be a concern.
-
Forums » Comcast’s Throttling Plans OutlinedEh, whatever »
« Really?  


Wednesday, 25-Nov 13:51:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [104] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [94] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [41] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [41] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [40] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [32] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
Most people now reading
· Telemarketing Hell: Heather's back [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Mysterious $800 Cash Deposit? [General Questions]
· Climate Change Scandal Erupts After Email Hack. [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· 1333mW AP?! Everything we know says it shouldnt exist.... [Wireless Service Providers]
· [Rant] Damn Sermons through my speakers! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [Rant] The Weather Channel [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Ordered U-Verse - What should my network look like? [AT&T U-verse]
· Several MS Updates today (11/24/2009). [Security]