Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T To Offer Three HD Streams » What a waste
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Laughable »
« Hooray!  

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

Re: What a waste

I tend to agree.
FTTN is 'relatively' inexpensive (compared to FTTH) and much faster to deploy.

FTTN upside:

Low(er) initial cost of deployment
Higher speed of deployment
Easier to fund (due to above), as noted, investors want quicker return
Able to cherry pick next gen upgrades easily.
TV/Internet/VoIP can run over this infrastructure today, and upgrade to FTTH or other can be paid for by existing FTTH/Uverse deployment.

FTTN downside:
Band-aid approach (i.e. doesn't get it all in one shot)
Requires infrastructure upgrades (pair bonding)
Limited reach (3000')
Will eventually require a complete rework (FTTH or other from FTTN)... swapout last mile of copper, and the last mile is the most expensive.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: What a waste

I don't think FTTN was a bad choice. The bigger problem is AT&T's 25mbps, 3,000 foot target.

Had they placed the nodes closer to homes, they could easily have 50mbps or more per home. That would have given them much more wiggle room for more advanced internet speeds, better HD quality, and more streams.

The physical size of the nodes could have been a lot smaller if they were serving fewer homes, too.

I would love have to have 3 HD streams, but count me in as being skeptical about the quality implications of reducing the bandwidth.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: What a waste

I don't think FTTN was a bad choice either.
FTTH is very slow and expensive to deploy.
FTTN can subsidize FTTH as needed. FTTH as a first round needs huge $$$ from nervous investors.
--
Canada = Hollywood North
Forums » AT&T To Offer Three HD StreamsLaughable »
« Hooray!  


Tuesday, 08-Dec 19:22:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [191] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [71] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [53] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [49] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [42] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [18] Verizon Settles With NJ Over Misleading FiOS Marketing
Most people now reading
· Servers UP!!! [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast Customers: Would You Prefer Metered Billing? [Comcast HSI]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Top 10 things to do while servers are down! [World of Warcraft]
· Google chief: Only miscreants worry about net privacy [Security]
· Account Hacked With Authenticator [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]
· SERVERS DoWN!!! [World of Warcraft]
· Triumph Emblems [World of Warcraft]