| reply to anon troll
Telus backtracks, says small ISPs should also pay for thrott Let's look at this for a moment, okay...In the first snippet, Telus is supporting consumer groups and small service providers. Telus even goes so far as to say that because Bell started the whole argument over throttling, the company should be liable for the costs.
In the second snippet... In a July submission to the CRTC, Telus clearly supports Bell on the throttling issue and makes clear in no uncertain terms that the CRTC's decision should not be extended to Telus, based on Telus' claim that they do not throttle. In essence, Telus is asking that the CRTC's decision over throttling not be extended to Telus. I smell a rat...
In Yesterday's news article (3rd snippet), Telus did a complete turn-about, now saying that small service providers involved in the dispute should also have to chip in. But wait a minute... go back and look at the first snippet and read the first sentence...Telus supports consumer groups and small service providers... A contradiction in terms. I should say.
The last snippet really is said with a deceitful tongue. Telus most certainly has been a central party in the CRTC's probe from the very beginning. Clearly, Telus does not want to face the wrath of the CRTC for any wrong-doing on their part for possible throttling. Telus has contradicted themselves on every angle right from the very beginning. |
