<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21156757</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:02:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:02:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160930</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/150104"><b>JSY</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  BF69 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Um why CAN'T Comcast do it? Which law are they violating? If Comcast isn't legally allowed to have caps then the wireless companies need to get rid of their 5 GB caps. Satelite internet companies need to get rid of thier caps too.<br> </div>Um, well, I didn't say they can't - I said if it was right?  Two different things.  That's the debate.  It shouldn't be "right" because someone thinks the only people who would violate the caps would be people doing things that they don't approve.<br><br>Of course they can do it.  They can do whatever the hell they want as long as it's lawful.  Just be sure not to call it 'unlimited' access.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160930</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:37:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Skippy25 <A HREF="/useremail/u/201506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>There are even less legitimate ways to have an upload of multiple gigs per month on a regular basis.<br> </div>Uh, backups?  Duh.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160237</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:57:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160636</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Why does my screen name always seem so appropriate?<br><br>If you think that because you use less than 250GB or even less than 10GB a month you could not be affected by this throttling policy then you truly are delusional.  <br><br>READ: You don't have to be a heavy user or pirate to get your paid for internet speeds chopped.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160636</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:55:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160609</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : You do realize that they will throttle <strong>you</strong>, the light/regular consumer, when you're downloading that 5-6GB game demo or patch or uploading that 1-2GB full SD card of family vacation pictures.  You will be treated like the thieving heavy abuser that you are...even if you only use less than 10 GB a month total.<br><br>Getting all hung up on 250GB cap only allows you to miss how comcast's lack of network capacity planning and deployment will now affect all users on congested nodes trying to use the bandwidth they pay for even if they are light, bursty sporadic, users.   Gone are the days of abusers and pirates being the only ones affected.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160609</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:51:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160077</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1313577"><b>thecrisis</b></A> : ROFL are you serious?  You obviously don't know how to use the internet if you think you can't use more than 250 GB worth of bandwidth legally.<br><br>Bottom line is Comcast is one of the worst ISP's out there.  There are much better, faster, and cheaper alternatives.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21160077</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:25:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159766</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/554510"><b>gweeper</b></A> : Legality is irrelevant.  BT [and some TCP implementations) are based on greedy algorithms that quite simply fail to scale in the real world of shared-fate infrastructure.  Buy dedicated pipes if you want dedicated services, or get your  to establish a municipality infrastructure. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159766</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:18:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1299892"><b>digitalfreak</b></A> : TK, is that you?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159547</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:20:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159347</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JSY <A HREF="/useremail/u/150104"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Frankly, I don't give a rats ass what people do with their bandwidth.  The real debate should be if it's right for Comcast to do this </div>Um why CAN'T Comcast do it? Which law are they violating? If Comcast isn't legally allowed to have caps then the wireless companies need to get rid of their 5 GB caps. Satelite internet companies need to get rid of thier caps too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159347</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:44:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159342</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  fldiver <A HREF="/useremail/u/123937"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Can't you come up with anything new and creative; clearly not because if you stopped and thought for 10 seconds you would realize there are plenty of legitimate ways to use more than 250GB</div>Then you should have no problem listing some of them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159342</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:41:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159340</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cabal <A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  keozu <A HREF="/useremail/u/763979"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>what could this do to voip?<br> </div>Nothing. VoIP uses 64-80 Kbps of data, when not compressed.<br> </div>At 80 Kbps one could use VoIP 24/7 and use only 25 GB a month. Just to make it clear to people how little bandwidth VoIP uses.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159340</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:40:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158482</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : I would like to know that as well. I live with two college roommates. the cable is in my name and i pay for it so i can the speed and service i want from my cable company. <br><br>Myself and one roommate watch videos on CNN and listen to online radio stations from Clear Channel, plus I have Vonage hooked up, the other watches shows online that she missed from earlier in the week from ABC and NBC. We still do windows updates and I send large documents across the country for various projects I volunteer with and does not include any of the class work either of the other two roommates have to upload for their online classes and we never come close to the 250 gig mark of Comcast. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158482</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:55:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158228</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/201506"><b>Skippy25</b></A> : There are few legitimate ways to use 250GB a month on a regular basis.<br><br>There are even less legitimate ways to have an upload of multiple gigs per month on a regular basis.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158228</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:04:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/201506"><b>Skippy25</b></A> : I would say yes it is right for them to do it. This is simply the most reasonable way to manager their network without them outright disconnecting the users.<br><br>If you abuse the network by their standards then your traffic gets a lower priority. That does not mean anything at all you do will be affected, though it could be if your abuse has oversaturated the node. Even then, the effect of this on your internet experience may very well go unnoticed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158206</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:00:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158169</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  keozu <A HREF="/useremail/u/763979"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>what could this do to voip?<br> </div>Limit each call to 14 minutes 59 seconds?<br><small>--<br>When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158169</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:53:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158042</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><b>Cabal</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  keozu <A HREF="/useremail/u/763979"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>what could this do to voip?<br> </div>Nothing. VoIP uses 64-80 Kbps of data, when not compressed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158042</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:31:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157713</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ztmike <A HREF="/useremail/u/442639"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>And BTW, people that use more than 250 gigs a month are piraters anyways, and I am glad to see ISPs getting involved in young males using 80% of their bandwidth so they can download bootleg copies of ironman.<br> </div>You seriously think people use all that bandwidth for illegal ways? There is so much stuff out there that IS LEGAL that will no longer be possible because Comcast can't just keep their current formula and then upgrade their system with D3..that would make to much sense for Comcast.<br><br>I guess they would rather get their healthy profits and video walls instead of screwing over their internet users. :uhh: <br> </div>Please site me how a NORMAL hosuehold would use 250 GB. And pleae don't post shit like using VoiP 24/7 or downloading 50 HD movies a month, because that's not normal usage.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157713</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:33:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157643</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/123937"><b>fldiver</b></A> : Can't you come up with anything new and creative; clearly not because if you stopped and thought for 10 seconds you would realize there are plenty of legitimate ways to use more than 250GB; WHY are there always people like you that always fall back on the RIAA/MPAA rhetoric..??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157643</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:23:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157600</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/150104"><b>JSY</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>And BTW, people that use more than 250 gigs a month are piraters anyways, and I am glad to see ISPs getting involved in young males using 80% of their bandwidth so they can download bootleg copies of ironman.<br> </div>Frankly, I don't give a rats ass what people do with their bandwidth.  The real debate should be if it's right for Comcast to do this and was it the right solution.  I don't want to hear that it's justified because certain people do this and this would only affect them.  Who gives a shit?  The ends do NOT justify the means.  Debate about Comcast's "solution" to their problem - not this bullshit red herring crap about this affects these people because they do this and good for them.  It only makes me think that you're guilty of doing the thing that you want people to think you abhor.  He who smelt it dealt it.  LOL!<br><br>And what's a 'pirater'?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157600</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:15:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157343</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641190"><b>imrf</b></A> : No it hasn't.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157343</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:34:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157213</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><b>swhitney2003</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cjaiceman <A HREF="/useremail/u/1092082"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  swhitney2003 <A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>This is actually a concern I didn't think of... I use skype a lot and I really do not want crappy connection because after 15mins I am going to be throttled.<br> </div>Unless your VOIP is using 70% (4.6Mbits/sec)of your connection you won't be throttled. VOIP uses very little data, but the latency is what counts. This is true of listening to music and everything like that.<br><br>What the throttling accounts to is if your downloading something larger than about 740MB, then you might be throttled. If your downloading something smaller than that then you won't be using your connection long enough to hit the 15 minute mark. And, on top of that, this will really only impact you when there is congestion on the node, if your node is not horribly oversold you won't see this on your connection. <br> </div>I use Skype for video chat, not pure phone calls. This is what will cause my upstream to be saturated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157213</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:13:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157150</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1496637"><b>lordofwhee</b></A> : A year ago, yes, but in the last few months streaming video has far surpassed torrents as the largest use of bandwidth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157150</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:04:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157007</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641190"><b>imrf</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  pspcrazy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1527101"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> The majority of congestion is now caused by video services like netflix, youtube, veoh, itunes, all you can download music services, and streaming sites. <br> </div>No it isn't. It's been said before the majority of bandwidth consumption is from P2P services. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:39:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The new Comcast fee</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156874</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><b>S_engineer</b></A> : Comcast-"In order to prevent further decline of our stock, we've announced the new 'Comcast Stock Devaluation Recovery Fee'. What this entails is the absolute cessation of all network upgrades, and the implementation of our recession contingency where we cap your Internet usage. Its you the consumer that's at fault. How do you the consumer expect Comcast to oversell our networks if you the consumer actually use them. It's a shame that you the consumer actually thought that we here at Comcast meant 'unlimited'. Any further actions on the part of the consumer may force us to curb your cable tv and VOD use.  We thank you for your time....and oh...by the way, our rates will increase 4% in the next quarter!"<br><small>--<br>The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156874</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:15:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156849</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1525403"><b>Smith6612</b></A> : Absolutely nothing. At most VoIP only requires 192kbps worth of upload and download to have the best call quality. With this new system those in a congested area will at least be able to take a break from Latency spikes on their VoIP until Comcast does DOCSIS 3.0]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156849</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:10:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939879"><b>openbox9</b></A> : Well, obviously it is an anti-Comcast rant, but I would expect nothing less from Karl. I still believe he was discussing Sandvine when he mentioned the stock price though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156763</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:53:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156757</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1527101"><b>pspcrazy</b></A> : Since when did ztmike on his post every mention the word torrent? You seem to think the majority of congestion is caused by torrents lol. The majority of congestion is now caused by video services like netflix, youtube, veoh, itunes, all you can download music services, and streaming sites. <br><br>Then again it does seem like you have some stake in comcast as you never give any one anti comcast some slack.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156757</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:51:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156739</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><b>baineschile</b></A> : Suppose it could be read like that, i just had assumed it was another anti-comcast rant]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156739</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:48:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156734</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : You might want to come in side so the sky does not hit you on the head when it falls.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156734</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:47:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156720</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939879"><b>openbox9</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Good job Karl, another Comcast lie. Why doont you look at the trend of comcast's stock since the throttling was uncovered...</div>As annoying as I find Karl's biased rants, he statement about stock price was made towards Sandvine, not Comcast.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156720</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:45:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156666</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1092082"><b>Cjaiceman</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  swhitney2003 <A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>This is actually a concern I didn't think of... I use skype a lot and I really do not want crappy connection because after 15mins I am going to be throttled.<br> </div>Unless your VOIP is using 70% (4.6Mbits/sec)of your connection you won't be throttled. VOIP uses very little data, but the latency is what counts. This is true of listening to music and everything like that.<br><br>What the throttling accounts to is if your downloading something larger than about 740MB, then you might be throttled. If your downloading something smaller than that then you won't be using your connection long enough to hit the 15 minute mark. And, on top of that, this will really only impact you when there is congestion on the node, if your node is not horribly oversold you won't see this on your connection. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156666</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:36:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><b>swhitney2003</b></A> : time to revert to the days of dialup and one phone line. No longer can you talk on the phone while surfing the web (or downloading content). Talking on the phone then a family member starts watching videos on youtube?... then your voip phone goes down.<br><br>This is actually a concern I didn't think of... I use skype a lot and I really do not want crappy connection because after 15mins I am going to be throttled.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156555</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:18:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156550</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><b>baineschile</b></A> : I will concede that its not 100%, but you must agree that it is a significant portion. Look up ANY legitamate torrent site and see what the top download of the week are.<br><br>Even with unbox and streaming netflix, xbox live and general web surfing, one would still have to watch 50+ movies per month to hit 250 gigs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156550</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:17:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156536</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/442639"><b>ztmike</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>And BTW, people that use more than 250 gigs a month are piraters anyways, and I am glad to see ISPs getting involved in young males using 80% of their bandwidth so they can download bootleg copies of ironman.<br> </div>You seriously think people use all that bandwidth for illegal ways? There is so much stuff out there that IS LEGAL that will no longer be possible because Comcast can't just keep their current formula and then upgrade their system with D3..that would make to much sense for Comcast.<br><br>I guess they would rather get their healthy profits and video walls instead of screwing over their internet users. :uhh: <br><small>--<br>ZZPERFORMANCE</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156536</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:15:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Yay karl, another blunder</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156507</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><b>baineschile</b></A> : Good job Karl, another Comcast lie. Why doont you look at the trend of comcast's stock since the throttling was uncovered...it has gone UP (barring the full market meltdown this week).<br><br>We all know you will report nothing but negative news about Comcast, but please, no lies.<br><br>And BTW, people that use more than 250 gigs a month are piraters anyways, and I am glad to see ISPs getting involved in young males using 80% of their bandwidth so they can download bootleg copies of ironman.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156507</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:10:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156493</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/401000"><b>jjoshua</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  keozu <A HREF="/useremail/u/763979"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>what could this do to voip?<br> </div>I suspect that it would not be good for audio quality.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156493</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:08:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>voip?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156466</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/763979"><b>keozu</b></A> : what could this do to voip?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21156466</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:04:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
