<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: upgrade or die in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21158642</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:56:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:56:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: upgrade or die</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21161683</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/277417"><b>Wills</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  patcat88 <A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I guess their beancounters said they can't have any growth from USF and T1 revenue. Upgrade or die. Nobody in their right mind would get DSL when cable is 2-3x faster for the same price.  Also I wonder does Embarq offer sub-$20 DSL or not. If not, they are living off USF fumes in their gas tank.<br> </div>I would like to correct you on that...There are people in their right mind who will chose DSL when cable is 2-3x faster at the same price. In my area it's either Comcast Cable or Embarq DSL. I have chosen Embarq DSL because they are more stable than Comcast, light years better support than Comcast, and Embarq has no issues with me running my own FTP/HTTP/SMTP servers on my connection like Comcast does.<br><br>When Hurricane Charley struck, all of the people on my block with Comcast had no service, TV or internet, for almost a month. My DSL never went down.<br><br>That, to me, is worth a heck of a lot more than 2 or 3 times the speed. What good is that speed when it isn't working?<br><small>--<br>I have a shaved head, a goatee, and tatoos. Don't you realize the rules don't apply to me.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21161683</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:40:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: upgrade or die</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159601</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/224712"><b>RainWind</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  patcat88 <A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nobody in their right mind would get DSL when cable is 2-3x faster for the same price.<br> </div>I said that once too, and switched to Time Warner.  I promptly switched back to Embarq.  Time Warner offered me double the speed for the same price.  What they delivered was dialup speeds.<br><br>I'm happily surfing along on Embarq's 10 meg package.  I rarely ever have any issues.  They've done a few things to annoy me, and I've had a few hiccups, but compared to Time Warner its a huge difference.  Plus when I call tech support I get someone who at least has a basic idea of what DSL is, and they can speak English.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159601</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:37:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: upgrade or die</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159447</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1091674"><b>DarnellP</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hottboiinnc <A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I don't believe they offer ~$20 DSL packages. But in some areas where you're the only provider I guess you don't have to.<br> </div>They offer 768/384 for $19.95 if bundled.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21159447</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:47:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: upgrade or die</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158642</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : well it depends.  what is the choices are 1.5mpbs dsl with nothing funky going with datapath to/from the internet or 3 to 5 mpbs cable that has various caps on total bandwidth, instanteous bandwith, various monitoring, dns redirection, and who knows what else?  i think to some users out there, that dsl connection at 1.5 mbps starts to become appealing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158642</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:58:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: upgrade or die</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158498</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : I don't believe they offer ~$20 DSL packages. But in some areas where you're the only provider I guess you don't have to.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158498</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:58:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>upgrade or die</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157853</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : I guess their beancounters said they can't have any growth from USF and T1 revenue. Upgrade or die. Nobody in their right mind would get DSL when cable is 2-3x faster for the same price.  Also I wonder does Embarq offer sub-$20 DSL or not. If not, they are living off USF fumes in their gas tank.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21157853</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:58:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
