<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton) in Shaw</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21158801</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:53:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:53:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21366114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : Wow, it's really bad tonight again.<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/349254573.png"> </a><br><br>It's not the same congestion as usual though. If I start a torrent download or use a download accelerator on an HTTP download, it's blazing fast and takes my connection to its full 10mbps. But any single-connection transfer is real slow.<br><br>Lots of weird things happening with Shaw over here...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21366114</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:34:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21346648</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  inetspec <A HREF="/useremail/u/1569513"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>TheMG, could you do a speed test at speedtest.shaw.ca and note the time and date you do so, as well as the results here?<br> </div>A speed test during congested times or during the day or both?<br><br>Anyways, here's a non-congested speed test, I'll post another one later tonight as things go to crap again. The time and date is shown on the results, note the ping time too.<br><br>Normal:<br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/347107423.png"> </a><br><br>Congested:<br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/347713485.png"> </a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21346648</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:32:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21340467</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1569513"><b>inetspec</b></A> : TheMG, could you do a speed test at speedtest.shaw.ca and note the time and date you do so, as well as the results here?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21340467</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:34:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21311739</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : ya I agree.  I went threw exact same thing last year.  It cleared up during summer holidays.  School started and same crap again.  Last year they credited my account for a whole bunch of months.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21311739</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:20:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21310579</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Warbucks <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410388"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Same timing as last year, it's rather odd.</div>I don't think it's odd at all. Think about it... school is now getting into high gear, temperatures are dropping, what could young people possibly do during weekday evenings? Use the internet of course!<br><br>I doubt Shaw ever actually fixed the congestion last year. It may just have been that the load has dropped. If they would have in fact added more capacity, you'd think while they're at it they'd add a little headroom in anticipation of increasing demand.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21310579</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:08:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21309406</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410388"><b>Warbucks</b></A> : I used to live in the west end last year, and I ran into these same issues.  Massive latency issues around peak times(7pm-midnight).  It took them over two months to finally fix the problem.  I moved to the south west side of the city, and the issues have started up again within the last couple weeks. <br><br>Same timing as last year, it's rather odd.  Either way I don't expect it to be fixed anytime soon knowing Shaw. I don't even bother calling anymore.  All they do is send out a tech, he tests the line and determines it's fine(of course it is, he's testing it during the times when the issue DOESN'T happen).<br><br>I'll wait and see what happens over the next few weeks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21309406</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:22:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21306373</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I am also on Extreme I in Edmonton, in the Millwoods are and my results are eerily similar to yours. Are they just too cheap to upgrade and get rid of this congestion?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21306373</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:54:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21305998</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : I don't know, they didn't give more specific detail, just that the "area" was affected.<br><br>I think it's pretty safe to say that if you didn't experience sub-100kbps upload speeds and very sluggish web browsing late last night through to this afternoon, you are not in the area they are having problems with.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21305998</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:25:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21305666</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410388"><b>Warbucks</b></A> : When you say "whole area" are you referring to Edmonton or just your grid/node/neighborhood?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21305666</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:24:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21305518</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : Well, after a call to Shaw they tell us that it's a known issue for the whole area that has been going on since the 17th and that they are working on it and that it could take a few more days. Apparently fairly substantial interference issues on one of their lines.<br><br>It has gotten better since the call, still not the upload speed I'm supposed to get but more bearable.<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/342810362.png"> </a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21305518</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:56:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21300358</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : And as if the congestion issues aren't enough, here's what I'm getting tonight:<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/342269558.png"> </a><br><br>Going to call them tomorrow if this keeps up. This is not right at all.<br><br>In other news, my DSL gets activated in 3 days. This time around, I'm going to keep the DSL even if things get better with Shaw, cause you never know when it's going to go down the crapper again...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21300358</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:19:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21295132</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Tracert to an Edmonton Server at 10:45 PM on Sunday Oct 19th.. 210 MS LOL..<br><br> <IMG SRC="http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/8528/edmtracertlolyv7.jpg"> <br><br>129 MS to seattle (Shaw high speed internet)<br><br> <IMG SRC="http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/6247/seattlepingoj7.jpg"> <br><br>ESEA pings at 10:48 PM on oct 19th.. looks like I will be going to bed early.<br><br> <IMG SRC="http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/5089/eseapingsjv8.jpg"> <br><br>GG shaw.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21295132</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:49:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21294912</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Speedtest<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/341704002.png"> </a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21294912</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:39:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21294895</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : tracert into Edmonton at 9:35pm sunday<br><br> 1  biad401-fe0-0-0-3-isl-1.gip.net (204.59.152.205)  1.055 ms  0.914 ms  0.893 ms<br> 2  57.64.2.77 (57.64.2.77)  0.858 ms  0.912 ms  0.782 ms<br> 3  57.64.2.181 (57.64.2.181)  1.317 ms  1.3 ms  1.326 ms<br> 4  rt0as-equinix.vx.shawcable.net (206.223.115.20)  2.133 ms  2.058 ms  2.421 ms<br> 5  rc2as-ge2-0-0.vx.shawcable.net (66.163.64.2)  1.749 ms  1.569 ms  2.036 ms<br> 6  rc2ch-pos2-0-0.il.shawcable.net (66.163.77.65)  18.723 ms  18.689 ms  18.907 ms<br> 7  rc1nr-pos0-15-0-0.wp.shawcable.net (66.163.76.61)  37.408 ms  37.461 ms  37.586 ms<br> 8  rc1sc-ge12-0-0.wp.shawcable.net (66.163.73.170)  37.347 ms  37.302 ms  37.331 ms<br> 9  rc1ar-pos3-0.ed.shawcable.net (66.163.76.121)  241.585 ms  176.342 ms  197.544 ms<br>10  dx2lo-g1.ed.shawcable.net (64.59.188.121)  199.972 ms  200.58 ms  189.579 ms]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21294895</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:35:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21291313</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : A tracert into edmonton on a sunday at 5am in morn.<br><br> 1  biad401-fe0-0-0-3-isl-1.gip.net (204.59.152.205)  1.31 ms  0.808 ms  0.68 ms<br> 2  57.64.2.77 (57.64.2.77)  0.772 ms  0.724 ms  0.674 ms<br> 3  57.64.2.181 (57.64.2.181)  1.252 ms  1.295 ms  1.269 ms<br> 4  rt0as-equinix.vx.shawcable.net (206.223.115.20)  1.71 ms  1.828 ms  2.159 ms<br> 5  rc2as-ge2-0-0.vx.shawcable.net (66.163.64.2)  1.601 ms  1.813 ms  1.666 ms<br> 6  rc2ch-pos2-0.il.shawcable.net (66.163.77.65)  19.094 ms  18.878 ms  19.283 ms<br> 7  rc1nr-pos0-15-0-0.wp.shawcable.net (66.163.76.61)  37.291 ms  37.368 ms  37.417 ms<br> 8  rc2sc-tge0-8-1-0.wp.shawcable.net (66.163.73.170)  36.852 ms  37.241 ms  37.155 ms<br> 9  rc1ar-pos3-0.ed.shawcable.net (66.163.76.121)  241.513 ms  169.876 ms  170.706 ms<br>10  rc2ar-ge2-0-0.ed.shawcable.net (66.163.70.34)  98.311 ms  97.122 ms  97.492 ms<br>11  dx2lo-g1.ed.shawcable.net (64.59.188.121)  99.4 ms  98.378 ms  98.176 ms]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21291313</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:11:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21285367</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Can report the same as others.  Has been going on past while and speeds can actually dip to 1.5Mbps.  Going to call Shaw and start asking for credit on my account if this is not fixed soon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21285367</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:21:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21281225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410388"><b>Warbucks</b></A> : Been going on for a little while here as well.  Absolutely terrible.  I should be pinging roughly 45ms to this IP.<br><br>  1     1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  192.168.1.1<br>  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br>  3    11 ms    11 ms    10 ms  rc2ar-ge5-0-0-2.ed.shawcable.net [64.59.189.211]<br>  4    92 ms    92 ms    94 ms  rc1ar-ge2-0-0.ed.shawcable.net [66.163.70.33]<br>  5   114 ms   122 ms   112 ms  rc2sc-pos0-0-0-0.wp.shawcable.net [66.163.76.77]<br>  6   115 ms   115 ms   111 ms  rc1nr-tge0-8-1-0.wp.shawcable.net [66.163.73.169]<br>  7   142 ms   147 ms   135 ms  rc2ch-pos5-0.il.shawcable.net [66.163.76.26]<br>  8   129 ms   152 ms   135 ms  rd2ec-pos10-0.il.shawcable.net [66.163.65.42]<br>  9   134 ms   136 ms   146 ms  equinix.xe-1-3-0.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net [206.223.119.61]<br> 10   131 ms   146 ms   129 ms  111.xe-3-3-0.cr2.ord1.us.scnet.net [216.246.88.146]<br> 11   149 ms   141 ms   139 ms  v21.ar1.ord1.us.scnet.net [216.246.95.243]<br> 12   145 ms   150 ms   146 ms  ge-1-45.cr.ChicagoEquinix.colocrossing.com [66.225.194.1]<br> 13   128 ms   144 ms   136 ms  ge-1-0-2.q3305.chicago.colocrossing.com [216.246.109.249]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21281225</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:12:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21190043</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : edmonton area here too, getting 120+ pings at these times as well]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21190043</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:56:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1569513"><b>inetspec</b></A> : The next time you call, ask them to check with second level support, who can check and see if there any issues in your node.<br><br>Your disposition may be getting in the way of the person you are speaking with being able to help you.  Remember, that person specifically did not cause the issue you are seeing.  If you feel that they are not being an advocate for your problem, ask to speak with someone above them.<br><br>Lay out your concerns in calm and collective manner.  It is unlikely the person you are speaking with will be able to do something at that very moment to instantly correct the problem.  However, with the appropriate information, and a solid plan in place, this person can work for you, and follow-up with you on this issue as the plan is executed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173620</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:01:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21164345</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : This has been going on for over 1 month. We have called from a real land line(telus), they come up with some BS and never come to do a service call. I have used Shaw for the last 4 years never have I been treated like I was today. I used Telus adsl about 5 years ago and never had a problem with CSRs. If there ever was a problem it was fixed PDQ. Really I should not have to go through this for something I am paying for and not receiving. I would be better off with:<br>1. a real phone<br>2. dial up<br>3. basic cable]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21164345</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:40:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21163892</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1392497"><b>cableguy84</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Dpjballegeer :</small><br><br>I am getting dropped in Edmonton every 5 min to 1hr.   Called Shaw they were far less then helpfull.  Called 12 times 4 times I got through before my Shaw phone cut out.  3 of the 4 times the phone cut out while talking to them asking the same dumb questions over and over.  The 4th time the guy on the other end told me I was calling from a different address .... funny one of the other guys gave me the right address.  Anyway I ended up hanging up on him ... he was far less then pleasant.  I may end up back with Telus. <br> </div>maybe you should consider calling them from a phone not cutting out, you may have better luck. Its obvious you require a service call.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21163892</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:13:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21163503</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I am getting dropped in Edmonton every 5 min to 1hr.   Called Shaw they were far less then helpfull.  Called 12 times 4 times I got through before my Shaw phone cut out.  3 of the 4 times the phone cut out while talking to them asking the same dumb questions over and over.  The 4th time the guy on the other end told me I was calling from a different address .... funny one of the other guys gave me the right address.  Anyway I ended up hanging up on him ... he was far less then pleasant.  I may end up back with Telus. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21163503</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:56:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158966</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : welcome to the club. got a 10mb line and can rarely get over 4 these days. calgary nw.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158966</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:25:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>FFS, not this again! (congestion in Edmonton)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158801</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484077"><b>TheMG</b></A> : Shaw Extreme-I:<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/328192184.png"> </a><br><br>How wonderful!<br><br>And of course, high pings too:<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>Tracing route to google.ca &#91;64.233.161.104&#93;&#012;over a maximum of 30 hops:&#012; &#012;  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  192.168.1.1&#012;  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#012;  3   120 ms   114 ms   108 ms  rc1arge6-0-0-3.ed.shawcable.net &#91;64.59.189.178&#93; &#012;  4   119 ms   120 ms   121 ms  rc2bbpos0-8-2-0.vc.shawcable.net &#91;66.163.76.161&#93;&#012;  5   124 ms   114 ms   113 ms  rc2wtpos1-0.wa.shawcable.net &#91;66.163.76.142&#93;&#012;  6   136 ms   122 ms   125 ms  74.125.48.233&#012;  7   130 ms   131 ms   122 ms  209.85.255.61&#012;  8   154 ms   154 ms   161 ms  209.85.241.210&#012;  9   174 ms   184 ms   168 ms  209.85.243.116&#012; 10   148 ms   145 ms   139 ms  72.14.232.140&#012; 11   172 ms   281 ms   172 ms  209.85.242.209&#012; 12   189 ms   187 ms   178 ms  64.233.175.219&#012; 13   189 ms   178 ms   181 ms  216.239.49.214&#012; 14   183 ms   185 ms   178 ms  od-in-f104.google.com &#91;64.233.161.104&#93;&#012; &#012;Trace complete.&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>Grrrrrrrr!<br><br>Started around early September. Not so surprisingly, this also coincides with back to school, and has been getting progressively worst over the past 3 weeks. It's like this from about 8:00 PM until past midnight.<br><br>Time to sign up for Teksavvy DSL again. I can't play games with this crap. :mad:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21158801</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:27:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
