Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Tests Dismiss Smut-Free Wireless Worries » Content Filtered?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Anticipated speeds at 10 yrs pathetic  
AuthorAll Replies


StreetSpirit
Premium
join:2002-08-13
Roslyn, NY
·Optimum Online
·Verizon Online DSL


1 edit
reply to FutureMon
Re: Content Filtered?

said by FutureMon See Profile :

said by Neyland See Profile :

You know, anything with a *.xxx domain name...
lol... Are "they" still trying to go for that? Personally, I wouldn't mind if they did - it seems like a smart way to make filtering easy for parents and anyone who wishes to block that type of content from reaching their computer(s)...

- FM
FM I can see your point, but think about this:

Responsible parents don't need the government's help with filtering content that is reaching their kids. I have two kids, one of whom is an avid computer user. I've tried different ways of filtering, and it can work without the FCC's help.

Besides, why should the tax payers who don't have children, or have grown children pay for free filtered broadband for parents who don't want to take the time to properly secure & filter their kid's computers.

And who decides what's filtered? Let's say my 9 year old needs to do research for biology, and finds a certain page filtered on this "free" service. Can I unblock it without writing to the FCC? Probably not.

This idea is fraught with problems and problematic thinking. Again, relying on the government to do something that you yourself should be doing is not a wise idea.

Dave


FutureMon
OW My Eyes
Premium,ExMod 2002-05
join:2000-10-05
Colorado Springs, CO
clubs:

I'm not advocating the filtering aspect of this discussion.

All I'm saying is that if ICANN did go ahead and create the .xxx domain, there would be no need for a "man in the middle" filtering system. All filtering would/could be done at the PC (or router/firewall) receiving the content.

The pron industry is against .xxx simply because it makes it too easy to block them, and in many cases they rely on obfuscation and typo's in web URL's to draw people to their domains.

Also, if someone is browsing an .xxx domain, there's pretty much no question that they want to be there if once they arrive (by whatever means), they don't leave.

- FM
--
Undisputed BBR Karaoke Champion! Care to challenge me?
-
Forums » FCC Tests Dismiss Smut-Free Wireless Worries« Anticipated speeds at 10 yrs pathetic  


Sunday, 06-Dec 10:47:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [128] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Is there any true cure for, or way to prevent, a hangover? [General Questions]
· HVAC - Leaving a bedroom window open? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents [Canadian Chat]
· How fast is your upstream internet connection? [General Questions]
· Bulb for garage door opener [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [General] Signal Strength/Range: Clear vs Clearwire [Clearwire]