BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| reply to Mactron
Re: Thanks Verizon
said by Mactron  :"...and they've chosen their words carefully, making sure they don't rule out the possibility."Once they are more established in their planed build out, Caps n-stuff will surely come. Their not going to spoil the Fiber hoopla party while their still becoming a player.  More established? Yeah we're talking 10 years minimum. By then I certianly hope capacity issues won't be a problem for any ISP. |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
 ·AT&T Southeast
| Unfortunately, I believe capacity issues will always be a problem for ISPs. Not because infrastructure investments aren't being made, but because demanding applications are so much easier and cheaper to produce and deploy than the infrastructure necessary to support them. |
|
tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
 ·Hollis Hosting
·Verizon Online DSL
·Fairpoint Communic..
| All networks have choke points. What differs is where they occur and how much it costs to increase capability. Raw bandwidth is cheap it is the cable that is expensive. The most expensive "cable" is customer first-mile access network.
Choke point for FTTP and DSL is at CO or DSLAM. It is relatively cheap to increase transmission performance.
Choke point for Cable DOCSIS is at the node, making it relatively expensive to increase capability.
That is why you see Cablecos going after "bandwidth hogs" and not Telcos. Verizon is using that as a marketing tool, they would be stupid not to. Verizon also wants to use FIOS to roll out IPTV. Cable will be hard pressed to compete due to limited network capacity.
/tom |
|
UncleDirtNap
join:2006-08-26
Pittsburgh, PA | reply to BF69
Capacity issues will always be a problem for Internet over cable. So long as multiple people are sharing the same bandwidth there's always going to be a person or two who takes more than the amount theoretically allotted to them. |
|
