MrMoody
Carbon Based Lifeform
join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC
 ·Embarq
 ·Skype
·magicjack.com
| reply to asdfdfdfdfdfdfdf
Re: Links for more information...
said by asdfdfdfdfdfdfdf :
They also claim that the fact that this was going on, at higher power levels then proposed wireless devices, and didn't cause interference problems with local residents is an indication of how overblown the concerns are. And how do they know it didn't cause problems? Did they ask? Would the average person complain to the FCC if his digital TV was blocking or glitching for a few minutes during the day? Would they have any clue why it happened if they were even home to see it? That's the problem with digital vs. analog interference. With an analog TV signal, interference is obviously interference. With digital, it's indistinguishable from any other reception error.
The broadcast industry response is that the large number of wireless devices that will likely be involved is much more significant than a small number of microphones managed by a limited number of people.
Yes, and the distance between neighboring houses is much smaller than the distance between a football stadium and any house.
--
Electile Dysfunction: the inability to become aroused over the choice for President put forth by either party. |
·