http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21167240 en Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:37:45 EDT Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:37:45 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21167958 nasadude : and that is the spirit in which I meant my criticism.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21167958 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:29:29 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21167313 Transmaster : It isn't the people in the background that are the problem, these are good people. It is the FCC Commissoners that are the problem
--
Send a prayer to Allah, eat Beans.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21167313 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:52:04 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21167240 DavePR : I am an amateur radio operator and I have been carefully following the testing done by the FCC and I assure you that they are quite competent, especially with Philips guys and Shure guys constantly looking over their shoulders.

The interference issues are valid and Larry Page is a spoiled child.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21167240 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:38:58 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21166160 Transmaster : Those of us who are Ham Radio operators have know this for years. The FCC used to be run by engineers now it is political hacks, just like everyone else in political position in Washington DC,they are there to feather their own nests. By the way DC has come to mean "Da Cash" .
--
Send a prayer to Allah, eat Beans.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21166160 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:29:18 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21166006 nasadude : The FCC is no longer competent to do anything technical. In cases where it does display technical competence, politics intrudes to change or surpress the results, depending on the outcome desired.

FCC decisions aren't based on technical grounds and haven't been for years.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21166006 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:00:02 EDT