site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
AuthorAll Replies


Jovi

join:2000-02-24
Mount Joy, PA

reply to cjski

Re: Perfect example of an activist judge

said by cjski:

said by ThrowDemsOut:

Reversing himself without any prompting from either participant in the case is almost by definition an example of judicial activism.
Dude! Let go of the right-wing talking point...the judge did the right thing.
How is his position right wing? I am a right winger and I totally disagree with him.
--
"Where's my coffee? Oh. I guess it's my turn to make it."


james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

said by Jovi:

How is his position right wing? I am a right winger and I totally disagree with him.
Because debating in your country has degenerated so much that it now consists entirely of calling your opponent a crazy left winger or a facist right winger (depending on what you are).


leevis
Growing Older But Not Up
Premium,ExMod 2001-04
join:2000-10-28
Pascagoula, MS

reply to Jovi

said by Jovi:

I am a right winger and I totally disagree with him.
Yup, same here. They don't come much more "right wing" than me, but I completely disagree with him as well. The judge absolutely did the right thing! I've always been taught that, when you make a mistake you correct it, even if the mistake hasn't been caught by someone else yet. In this case, it's not activism, it's honesty and humility.

Leevis
--
"I've got a Caribbean soul I can barely control..." -JB


digitalfreak
Premium
join:2005-12-09
Blacklick, OH

reply to Jovi

said by Jovi:

said by cjski:

said by ThrowDemsOut:

Reversing himself without any prompting from either participant in the case is almost by definition an example of judicial activism.
Dude! Let go of the right-wing talking point...the judge did the right thing.
How is his position right wing? I am a right winger and I totally disagree with him.
Corporate shill fits him much better.


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

1 edit

reply to james
TJunk is not a right-winger, he's a corporatist. If you look back in his posting history it will show you he has very little understanding just about anything but he thinks otherwise...

He's not a right-wing person, I agree - he's an ultra-right-wing corporate extremist who thinks all these things he preaches would be good for his stock portfolio.
--

said by bicker:

Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true. Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.


james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

said by kamm:

He's not a right-wing person, I agree - he's an ultra-right-wing corporate extremist
Yeah, or he could be someone with a different opinion than you have. It's amazing how afraid we are of questioning our own beliefs, as if someone who disagrees with us will somehow make us wrong.


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

said by james:

said by kamm:

He's not a right-wing person, I agree - he's an ultra-right-wing corporate extremist
Yeah, or he could be someone with a different opinion than you have.
Ummm WTF? How is it relevant here?
There are a lot of different views here yet non has been declared such a corporate-licker one like his ones.

It's amazing how afraid we are of questioning our own beliefs, as if someone who disagrees with us will somehow make us wrong.
It's amazing when someone with obviously little or zero clue about his track record jumps in and starts posting empty cliches confidently... how about reading up a little bit?
--
[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true. Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.
[/BQUOTE]


james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

said by kamm:

It's amazing when someone with obviously little or zero clue about his track record jumps in and starts posting empty cliches confidently... how about reading up a little bit?
It's amazing how every time I defend TK, people accuse me of not knowing "his track record". Yeah, I know what his opinion is, I read it almost every day. I even disagree with him in almost every post he makes, and I take the time to argue with him sometimes.

Maybe instead of acting like an immature dunce, you could try stringing a few sentences together without resorting to ad hominem arguments to prove your point.

Remember kamm, if you were taking flack on a regular basis for giving your opinion I would be sticking up for you too, regardless of whether or not I agree with said opinion.

Monday, 13-Feb 18:04:41 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics