<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Extremely Slow Network Printing in Networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21172670</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:20:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:20:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21195238</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : So now I am set upon by comedians! ;)<br><br>Did I mention that I used to annihilate matter for a living?  Never met an anti-particle that I couldn't convert to pure energy but never got the anti-matter beam weapon working.<br><br>Actually, there may be something to your post.  I have two Phasers (7300DN, and 8550DN) and you can install drivers by accessing their web interfaces.  There have been indications that you don't necessarily get the latest drivers for your OS that way.  Maybe need to do a direct D/L from the Xerox site.<br><br>Something else to try next time I'm at home savoring the aroma of the radon from my piece of K-65 ore.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21195238</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:24:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193878</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/312704"><b>fox7</b></A> : RWild:<br>   If you will permit one more addition...<br><br>   Some one was commenting earlier about EXACT problem, so I didn't comment at that time, but will now hoping this could be a possible solution.<br><br>  No crawling involved!!<br><br>  We have a Phased 3500N in our environment, set not on 'stun', but 'disable' for that commenter.  :)  (That was a joke)<br><br>  The problem is not exactly like yours, slow printing, but it just fell off the screen and was not shown to be present on two machines I had installed it on.  Yet it remained on several other machines I had installed it on.<br><br>  I re-installed the printer and that was my fix and I suggest that to you.  Re-install the printer!!<br><br>Go to the 'Printers folder' under the 'Start menu' and remove the 7500 Phaser from you printer list.  Then click on 'File' on the Menu bar in the Printer folder, choose Server Properties, choose the Drivers tab and Remove the driver from that machine.<br><br>Now you can go for a clean re-install of the 7500DN Phaser.<br><br>If this resolves your problem, you can pay homage if you choose...  but might be bad on the knees!  :)<br><br>fox7]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193878</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:16:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193794</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : I WAS at the location when I started the thread. I do what I can with the time I have at home.<br><br>I would say that the useful life of this thread has been reached.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193794</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:00:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193639</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/677602"><b>ChiTang</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RWild <A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I am not sure that it has registered yet that I am no longer in the same physical location as the network/printer and will not be for some days.<br><br>I do appreciate your suggestions but please do not expect any feedback for some time.<br> </div>I certainly am not going to lose any sleep over it.<br>!<br>For a person who asks for help to troubleshoot a network problem while he is not at the location is just a bit tough (that is the best word I can come up with).<br><small>--<br><b>I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193639</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:31:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193557</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : I am not sure that it has registered yet that I am no longer in the same physical location as the network/printer and will not be for some days.<br><br>I do appreciate your suggestions but please do not expect any feedback for some time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193557</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:17:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193064</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/677602"><b>ChiTang</b></A> : Don't get me wrong, I am not displeased. To me, without a fedback, I cannot continue.<br><br>Your problem is not printing, it prints, it is the performance of printing (too slow).<br><br>You are not witch hunting here cos it was fine b4 and it is not now.<br><br>You did have some feedback about 192.168.1.X and TCP/IP is active and fixed IP for printer. The point is, if you can print, TCP/IP has to be active, IP has to be in the same subnet. It does not help to narrow down your problem.<br><br>As you have so many switches cascading together, a network layout will show which link is likely to be the point of failure. Since you are in a condition that deos not allow you to do so, we can try other things without heavy lifting.<br><br>1. Change the cable between Xeror and switch<br>2. Use the port in the switch.<br>3. Reset the switch.<br>4. As suggested, print from a PC that is using the same switch and C if the speed is the same or faster.<br><br> <br><small>--<br><b>I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21193064</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:55:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21192688</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : There IS feedback to suggestions from others, as well as to your suggestions.<br><br>Although I was being facetious about being hospitalized, I indicated in my original reply to you that the type of physical activity necessary and a schedule that allows me infrequent time at home made it impossible to act on your suggests this past trip home.<br><br>I cannot quite bring myself to be sorry if this displeases you, as it apparently does.<br><br>I DO appreciate ALL of the suggestions people have made.  It appears that rewiring the network, or at least part of it, is going to be necessary to make progress.  That will have to wait.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21192688</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:59:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21192289</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/677602"><b>ChiTang</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RWild <A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I really wish I could give you a picture but I would have to be hospitalized if I moved all of the furniture and crawled around under tables to get the information to draw an accurate picture before I have to go back to work in another state.  Didn't bring the pain pills this trip.<br></div>Fair enough for mature individual with a medical condition, do you have kids?<br><br>There is no feedback for the suggestions from others. So I am not sure whether you are looking for a suggestion that you can manage or a suggestion that you accept or simply ignore suggestion that you deem irrelevant.<br><br>At least a feedback, like<br><br>I did this but didn't work<br>I could't do this bcos I didn't have that.<br>I didn't do this cos I didn't apply as far as I am concerned.<br><br>This is needed during troubleshooting.<br><small>--<br><b>I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21192289</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:54:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21191067</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  daveinpoway <A HREF="/useremail/u/1371265"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If the router supports this (many do, but probably not all), I have found it to be just as effective to have the host device acquire its IP address via DHCP and then reserve an IP address (that always corresponds to the host device's MAC address) within the router. All my stuff is set up this way, and I haven't noticed any issues.<br> </div>My router does support this and I do reserve the printer IPs, once the router assigns them.  When I worked full-time from home and had several ethernet printers, it was pretty much a necessity.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21191067</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:58:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21190682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1371265"><b>daveinpoway</b></A> : If the router supports this (many do, but probably not all), I have found it to be just as effective to have the host device acquire its IP address via DHCP and then reserve an IP address (that always corresponds to the host device's MAC address) within the router. All my stuff is set up this way, and I haven't noticed any issues.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21190682</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:31:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21188510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/312704"><b>fox7</b></A> : RWild:<br>   Do you have that printer on a Static IP???   Assigned within the 7300 Phaser's set up AND designated with the Router/NAT device??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21188510</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:23:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21176491</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/677602"><b>ChiTang</b></A> : When you expand your network by adding cascading switches (easy and cheap way to accomplish), it is OK. The drawback is that when a problem occurs (espicially speed/performance problem), the troubleshooting is tough.<br><br>If you don't want to move furnitures, lift heavy objects, at least do some troubleshooting by segments within your lan.<br><small>--<br><b>I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21176491</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:58:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21175166</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Matt <A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote">It isn't fun, but unless someone comes along who has had this exact issue, you're going to have to perform a bit of troubleshooting.</div> </div>This is the really frustrating part.  I'm only home a couple of days every couple of weeks and crawling around under tables and desk takes a serious tool on this old, fat, arthritic body.<br><br>Gravity is a bring-down.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21175166</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:57:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/677602"><b>ChiTang</b></A> : There is so many tell tell signs to narrow it down.<br><br>Is it slow on first page only?<br>When printing multiple pages, does the subsequent pages print fast?<br><br>If the cable for Xerox is not at 100 mbit, performance may suck. It could be bad cable or bad ports (switch or Xeror) or ports are not negotiated properly.<br><br>Send a print job to the Xerox from a PC in the same segment of the Xeror and if it is distinctively faster.<br><small>--<br><b>I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174468</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:35:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174397</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RWild <A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I used to have one computer connected to it by parallel cable and it worked normally then.  It's not connect that way now.  Of course, at one time it worked great with all the computers in the house via ethernet. <br> </div>I'd like to see a test of a computer connected directly to it. The network card could be going bad, or the printer itself could be going bad. Hooking a computer directly to it would isolate a big potion of what the problem may (or may not) be.<br><br>If a computer hooked directly to it works fine, try sharing the printer from the computer attached to it and see what the result of that is.<br><br>It isn't fun, but unless someone comes along who has had this exact issue, you're going to have to perform a bit of troubleshooting.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/">Linux Haters Unite!</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174397</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:22:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174360</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : I used to have one computer connected to it by parallel cable and it worked normally then.  It's not connect that way now.  Of course, at one time it worked great with all the computers in the house via ethernet. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174360</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:16:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174336</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : I really wish I could give you a picture but I would have to be hospitalized if I moved all of the furniture and crawled around under tables to get the information to draw an accurate picture before I have to go back to work in another state.  Didn't bring the pain pills this trip.<br><br>I have lots of stuff scattered across four rooms.  Two computers in the bedroom, five and a printer server in the study, a Slingbox in the living room, and four computers and three ethernet printers in the home office.  I used to work from home but am now a road warrior.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174336</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:10:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174281</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RWild <A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No.  The 7300 has not always had this problem either.<br> </div>Hrmmm, could it be the network interface going bad? If you hook a parallel cable directly to the printer does it exhibit the same symptoms?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/">Linux Haters Unite!</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174281</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:01:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174270</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : No.  The 7300 has not always had this problem either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174270</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:00:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : Do you have other printers on the network that exhibit this problem?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/">Linux Haters Unite!</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174206</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:48:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174196</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : Ping from the box with the most direct route is  1 ms (Dual 1.8 Xeons (P4).  The other is  10 ms (Dual 933 Xeons (P3).<br><br>Only TCP/IP is active.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174196</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:46:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174182</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : Yes, everything is on 192.168.1.x]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21174182</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:44:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173619</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/312704"><b>fox7</b></A> : Ping it's IP and tell use what the times are.<br><br>fox7<br><br>and I like ChiTang suggestion also.<br><br>Edit:  Ya know...  Those printers come with all protocols active.  I would turn off all except TCP/IP, if that is what you are using.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173619</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:01:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173274</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/766601"><b>avd706</b></A> : Try setting it to stun...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173274</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:05:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173208</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : Is the phaser attached directly to the network?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173208</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:56:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173014</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/677602"><b>ChiTang</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RWild <A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Is the topology my problem?<br> </div>It could be, with a picture is easier to tell.<br><br>Since you have so many switches, if one of the link between switches is not up to speed. The performance in that segment degrades.<br><br>How many devices do you have that requires 4 more switches to the router?<br><br>To isolate if the Xeror is the problem, just add a local printer to one of the PCs in the same segment of the Xeror, share it, print from another PC that is 4 switches away and time it.  <br><small>--<br><b>I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21173014</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:22:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Extremely Slow Network Printing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21172670</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874867"><b>RWild</b></A> : I have a Xerox Phaser 7300DN on my network.  It and everything that talks to it (NICs, switches, router) are 10/100 Mbps.  It takes forever to get a printer job to it.  It takes about a minute for it to begin to receive a test page and start warming up.<br><br>One computer has to go through two switches (B and A) to get to the router and two more (A and B) to get to the printer.  I believe another goes switch (A) router switch (B)printer.<br><br>Is the topology my problem?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21172670</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:24:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
