Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » VoIP Vulnerabilities Being Exposed Today » Excellent!!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« illusion of privacy  
AuthorAll Replies
-


anony101

@comcast.net

from:
TKJunkMail See Profile

reply to Cabal
Re: Excellent!!

False. Look up BPI+.
I've seen it done. All it takes is a trip to RadioShack.


anony101

@comcast.net

reply to nitzan
I could be wrong, but AFAIK your neighbors CANNOT sniff your packets. Unless they have access to the switch - which they don't - they cannot listen in on you.
You ARE wrong.

Why don't you do some READING on the subject. That will save you from posting misinformation which some here will assume is correct.


Cthen

join:2004-08-01
Ypsilanti, MI
·Comcast

reply to nitzan
said by nitzan See Profile :

Interesting. Didn't know that.

So essentially, cable internet is inherently less secure than, say, DSL? or better yet - FTTH?
Since when has the internet ever been secure on any ISP? Just because some connections go through the CO first doesn't mean some one can't tap into it along the way.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to pfak
There is no protection against tampering with the signals on the RF cable network.

The main advantages of BPI+ in DOCSIS 1.1 is the capability to upgrade crypto mechanisms in already deployed Cable Modems and the use of digital certificates to authenticate Cable Modems.

Notice also that all setup and configuration of the BPI functions are made at the CMTS, so as a user you have very little control over when your data are encrypted and when they are not. In reality the purpose of BPI and BPI+ is this

* To protect against theft of service
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


pfak
Premium
join:2002-12-29
Canada
·Shaw
·Novus Entertainmen..

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

You couldn't do it on the PC side of the cable modem. But if you hook up a device directly to the cable and bypass the cable modem altogether with a sniffer device, you could see and capture the packets on your local node.
Look up BPI+.

Sometimes I really wish DSLR had a moderation system like Slashdot so all your posts would be "-1"
--
Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community.


Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA

reply to anony101
said by anony101 :

Keep in mind however that the only ones who can "listen in" on your calls are your ISP, our ISP, and the phone companies on the way. None of which are going to bother filtering through millions of minutes of call time.
That's not accurate. Cable customers can listen in to unencrypted VOIP calls within the same node they're in which means their neighborhood.
False. Look up BPI+.
--
Do you care about network neutrality, the right to privacy, or patent system abuse? Obama used to.

nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
reply to TKJunkMail
Interesting. Didn't know that.

So essentially, cable internet is inherently less secure than, say, DSL? or better yet - FTTH?


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


1 edit
reply to nitzan
said by nitzan See Profile :

said by anony101 :

Keep in mind however that the only ones who can "listen in" on your calls are your ISP, our ISP, and the phone companies on the way. None of which are going to bother filtering through millions of minutes of call time.
That's not accurate. Cable customers can listen in to unencrypted VOIP calls within the same node they're in which means their neighborhood.
I could be wrong, but AFAIK your neighbors CANNOT sniff your packets. Unless they have access to the switch - which they don't - they cannot listen in on you.
You couldn't do it on the PC side of the cable modem. But if you hook up a device directly to the cable and bypass the cable modem altogether with a sniffer device, you could see and capture the packets on your local node.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
·ViaTalk
·Comcast

reply to anony101
said by anony101 :

Keep in mind however that the only ones who can "listen in" on your calls are your ISP, our ISP, and the phone companies on the way. None of which are going to bother filtering through millions of minutes of call time.
That's not accurate. Cable customers can listen in to unencrypted VOIP calls within the same node they're in which means their neighborhood.
I could be wrong, but AFAIK your neighbors CANNOT sniff your packets. Unless they have access to the switch - which they don't - they cannot listen in on you.


knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to anony101
said by anony101 :

Keep in mind however that the only ones who can "listen in" on your calls are your ISP, our ISP, and the phone companies on the way. None of which are going to bother filtering through millions of minutes of call time.
That's not accurate. Cable customers can listen in to unencrypted VOIP calls within the same node they're in which means their neighborhood.
Does that mean all Cable calls are unencrypted by default? How would a customer turn on encryption?
--
Fight NebuAD and the like:
Click Here to pollute their data


anony101

@comcast.net

reply to nitzan
Keep in mind however that the only ones who can "listen in" on your calls are your ISP, our ISP, and the phone companies on the way. None of which are going to bother filtering through millions of minutes of call time.
That's not accurate. Cable customers can listen in to unencrypted VOIP calls within the same node they're in which means their neighborhood.
Forums » VoIP Vulnerabilities Being Exposed Today« illusion of privacy  


Thursday, 26-Nov 18:27:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [107] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [69] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [61] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [42] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [34] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
Most people now reading
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]