site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1079
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

Obama wants more rural broadband thru USF fees

“More than half also oppose Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposals that would diminish support for rural wireless by nearly 50 percent, jeopardizing public safety and economic development in smaller communities.”
Then these people will like Obama's proposal:
»blog.wired.com/business/2008/09/···for.html
Obama's idea, as described in his technology plan, is to take some of the tax money being used right now to subsidize rural phone use and, instead, use it to subsidize rural broadband use.
I think they should kill off the USF fees altogether and not use it for broadband or anything else.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


Zorack

join:2001-12-14
Fayetteville, WV

I don't think anything by McPain is any better.



pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by Zorack:

I don't think anything by McPain is any better.
Why should people expect the government to provide them with internet to begin with? If people want internet they should build it themselves... without government.
--
"At the moment of conception."


tubbynet
reminds me of the danse russe
Premium,MVM
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ

pretty easy to say that when people already have what they want...
when you have corporations only interested in the bottom line and not seeing the right roi on their deployment, you have essentially shafted a group of people. you say that people should "build their own", but what dictates that this group of people knows how to deploy large scale wisp or cellular networks? above and beyond that - logistics and cost of entry is enormous and prohibitive almost everybody except for those that have the outright capital at hand (namely corporations or the government).

amazing that all of the neo-cons on here rant and rave about government involvement with an "i've got mine, i don't care about yours" attitude. nobody wants socialism because we will "pay too much in taxes and not get anything in return", but who is to say that if we go strictly capitalist (with *no* government involvement) that a corporation that is looking strictly at the bottom line will help the consumers any more?

q.



Duramax08
A Challenger Appears
Premium
join:2008-08-03
San Antonio, TX
Reviews:
·Millenicom
·Cricket Broadband
·Juno Express
·Clearwire Wireless

reply to pnh102

Click for full size
"If people want internet they should build it themselves... without government."

Got any plans so i can build internets so I can get faster internets out here? Guess I cant get a loan from the FCC to start internets over here even though they got fiber 1 mile away from me...... Also if you were going to say "well its ur fault u moved where you dont get fast internets LOL". Actually, my grandparents bought this house 50 years ago. We got it when they passed away. I dont think there was high speed internet back in the days so dont even go there. We are not even a mile away from the city limits of san antonio. Last time i checked san antonio was one of the top 10 biggest cities in the USA. I thought we would have better services that would make our lifes easier but i guess we wont make progress on the internet game. Just look where we are. Where is the united states? North america also includes canada just to let you know.
--
»live.xbox.com/member/Duramax08

jc100

join:2002-04-10

reply to pnh102
And if people want education they should pay for it as I told Texan. Why bother with Tax Payer Subsidized anything.. O crap, 700 billion is funding Big Business soon. I guess that one kind of went out the window. Bush Mismanagement = Tax Payer Nightmare. Back to rant.

- You can read and write. I guess you got through k-12 education somewhere in the U.S? Let me guess, your PARENTS did not pay for the teacher's salaries, school operational costs, and text books. If you went to a public school, ALL tax payers SOCIALIZED your education. Meaning, even if your school had 1000 students, 30 teachers, and cost 5 million to operate. It was NOT just those parents of the 1000 kids paying the bill. It was the ENTIRE COMMUNITY, State, Federal Government doing so. IE, Unless you want a system where those 1000 parents split the "5 million bill here", then you are socialized. Otherwise, tax payers from your city, state, and all over the U.S. have paid taxes that funded your education.

Will you be cutting them a BIG FAT check to return that money?

How about roads. You like driving on them, I imagine. Well Socialized again. I mean, I don't see you giving Tax payers a SECOND HUGE check. Roads were socialized. Not only was my money used, yours and everyone elses got put into the pot. That's the definition of SOCIALISM. Therefore, please BUILD YOUR OWN ROADS. Socialism is bad. Otherwise, please reimburse the other tax payers or pay a fee every time you drive on a road. Sound good?

Second check in the mail will be sent when?

Last, how about Medical Care. You enjoy nice drugs when you get sick. Please don't. Tax Payer money SOCIALIZED the research that went into finding them. After all Universities, Hospitals, etc all receive tax payer money. Will you be paying the FULL COST of the drug you take (not the insurance rate) the Billion plus to find that drug? I fathom not. Strange, but you enjoy using medicine.

So where will you get the 3rd check from. You MUST be broke from the 0s found in checks 1 and 2.

Long story short, people should do things on their own. However, government is also needed when other parties fail.



pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

reply to tubbynet
Who said anything about socialism? There's nothing stopping private citizens from making their own private investments and building their own network privately.
--
"At the moment of conception."



pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

reply to jc100
Yawn. So again, why should taxpayers pay for someone's luxury service?

Education is actually an important service provided by state and local government. Considering that many public schools suck, perhaps government should fix that before they screw the pooch on a luxury wireless or broadband service?

As for roads, these are all paid by user fees. All of the taxes, tolls and other fees used to finance roads are voluntary. If someone doesn't drive they do not pay for them.

As for socialized medicine, I will believe this is a better system once people from the USA start going in droves to Canada, Europe or Cuba for the "free" healthcare offered there. Hopefully, they won't come back.
--
"At the moment of conception."



pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

reply to Duramax08
But again, why should private investors finance their own network? Most cell phone companies and ISPs paid for their infrastructure using subscriber fees, why can't the people of WV do the same?
--
"At the moment of conception."



John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3

reply to pnh102

said by pnh102:

said by Zorack:

I don't think anything by McPain is any better.
Why should people expect the government to provide them with internet to begin with?
Perhaps because the people already paid for it...??

From the document:

You're owed money. We estimate that you are owed over $2000.00 per household for a fiber optic broadband network service you have yet to receive and for other overcharging from your local Bell phone company — SBC, Verizon, BellSouth and US West. It is impossible to tell the exact amount in your state without audits.

This is the true tale of one of the largest scandals in US history.

We will attempt to show how America entrusted the phone companies with our fiber optic Digital Future and we were taken to the cleaners. It not only cost you and everyone you know a significant sum of money, but it has also harmed our entire economy. It is the reason America is not first in broadband in the world but 12th or 16th, depending on which international agency’s data you believe.

We estimate that the failed fiber optic deployments have cost America over $206 billion in higher phone rates, tax breaks and other financial perks to the phone companies, and it has cost the American economy an estimated $500 billion annually in loss of new growth — so far a total of about $5 trillion.

It is a tale of deceit, fraudulent data and gaming the regulatory system using fake consumer groups, biased research firms and campaign-financed politicians to control everything from the FCC, to Congress, to the state legislatures and commissions to vote for phone company-financed laws that are not in the public interest.


Read on...
--
A is A

dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
kudos:7
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to pnh102

said by pnh102:

said by Zorack:

I don't think anything by McPain is any better.
Why should people expect the government to provide them with internet to begin with? If people want internet they should build it themselves... without government.
Right. Exactly like we do with, oh, highways for example.

nnaarrnn

join:2004-09-30
Nitro, WV

reply to pnh102
yeah, except the pesky spectrum that you cant get your hands on due to the incumbents owning it all, and the lobbying so that joe-average-guy can't compete with them.


nnaarrnn

join:2004-09-30
Nitro, WV

reply to pnh102
I dont see how being able to have a choice of service provider (landline vs wireless) is a luxury. There's 200 million people that seem to have that choice, and chose wireless. Why shouldn't people in more rural areas have that choice?

I dont know about roads in Maryland, but here in WV, the roads are paid for from general taxes. If you have a job, you're paying for the roads. Yes, there are a couple of toll booths on the turnpike, and our state capitol city of Charleston ILLEGALLY forces a user fee on anyone who works there, but for any road outside of Charleston and the turnpike, EVERYONE pays for regardless if they drive or not.


nnaarrnn

join:2004-09-30
Nitro, WV

reply to pnh102
you answered your own question. They pay for their infrastructure using subscriber fees, but they're not doing that here. They're just reaping the profits.

I do know that the death star added 27 "cell sites" over the past couple years, but they still have the slowest, poorest coverage around here.



ifarrell

join:2000-08-10
Willow Spring, NC

reply to fAcEtIOUs
Except 90% of WV hate Obama.


jc100

join:2002-04-10

reply to pnh102
A) Education is Socialized. Cutting a Check or Refund back to tax payers for your education.

B) Everyone pays for roads. Everyone pays taxes. Wrong again bud. License Plates aren't the only thing that go to maintaining roads. All tax dollars are used to help out there. Socialized again. Whether or not you drive, you fund the roads that are built and construction to maintain. Writing another BIG CHECK?

C) Good, since you hate socialized medicine, DON'T get prescriptions. You can go to the doctor but not get the cure. After all, Tax payer money HELPED socialize the research on MANY drugs we see today. Good enough. You can have your diagnosis but not the method to fix!


jc100

join:2002-04-10

reply to ifarrell
=). Then I say let them vote Republican and see if they ever get that broadband they are wishing for. I got a funny Hunch, they don't want the government's help if that's how they vote. But wow, we've found 700 billion to give to PRIVATE COMPANIES so tax payers can eat the cost. Amazing how that works.


dsless

join:2001-05-16
Pittsburgh, PA

reply to nnaarrnn
Poca Was not wired with cable for internet till 2002-2003. As least you can get DSL in Nitro.



knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN

reply to pnh102

said by pnh102:

If people want internet they should build it themselves... without government.
We try, but the government actually gets in the way a lot because of either no regulation/laws such as it keeps you stuck in limbo for approval or big companies who have lobbied the area so that only they are allowed to provide broadband. So the government ends up getting involved even when you are trying to avoid them.

Real life experience talking here.
--
Fight NebuAD and the like:
Click Here to pollute their data


knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN

reply to ifarrell

said by ifarrell:

Except 90% of WV hate Obama.
I thought it was the other way around?

Found my source here:
»makeupfakestatsforyourneeds.com/···ama.html
--
Fight NebuAD and the like:
Click Here to pollute their data

Thursday, 31-May 20:58:47 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics