<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Hmmm... this sounds actually competitive... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21185646</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:56:31 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:56:31 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Hmmm... this sounds actually competitive...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21185646</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : ... considering what a ripoff AT&T et al will charge you when you need it both on your phone and your laptop and considering what an utter piece of shit service you get from AT&T since iTards flooded the network (here in Downtown NYC I can't reach even 500kbit/s on my TyTn anymore.)<br><br>$50 for both is actually OK - it's twice as much as the unlimited AT&T but if it, unlike AT&T, will actually give you the promised bandwidth then it's a lot better deal, not to mention the ridiculous tethering-limitations, proxy- and other issues with AT&T's network.<br><small>--<br>[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa.  You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true.  Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.<br> [/BQUOTE]</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21185646</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:10:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
