site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
788
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Brooklyn, NY
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS

just point out the obvious

unless your "mobile" and traveling somewhere... a simple wifi hotspot will do nicely and much more inexpensively, possibly free!

it's also quite obvious they will provide service on their terms and not yours.. so why even bother subscribing?

let sprint choke on their own stupidity, and that goes for all wireless carriers doing broadband! this is a simple grab at preventing voip and other value services from crippling cell phone subscriptions. boycott the service until they get it right.

nokiatech

join:2000-10-18
Stuart, FL
Reviews:
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast

WTH are you babbling about? There are a lot of people who are "mobile" and "traveling somewhere" pretty much every single day. There are also many who are looking for choices beyond very limited incumbent offerings in their area. How is competition bad?

There should be a website that people could go to learn about their options. They could have forums and news articles about up and coming services. I think www.broadbandreports.com or something would be fitting. Oh well, it would just choke on it's own stupidity.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to tmc8080
Actually sounds like they ARE getting it right.

The modem (hmm ZyXEL) actually has some phone ports on it for VoIP down the road, probably less expensive than cableco service...I'd think more in line with what T-Mobile offers. And the modem isn't that much more expensive than your typical cable modem. That's a very good thing. It's also nice that the ExpressCard (and probably soon the USB stick) will be just $60. Much less expensive than mobile broadband, especially considering there's no contract.

It's interesting that it looks like the ended up not using Alvarion network equipment...it's all Nokia\Siemens, motorola, Alcatel-Lucent.

Pricing is really good, comparable to low-tier DSL or cable, without the cable...with the only startup price being the device you're getting, as opposed to a $50+ installation fee, plus the cost of renting or buying a modem.

Hopefully some people can test it out and run the service until Sprint gets mad at them, so we know where the caps are. But having cable-speed upstream and decent downstream speeds for $35 or less per month...that's just great. If it was in my area, and the caps were good, I'd switch over.

What's interesting is that Xohm is being deployed mainly in high population areas for now, and in Baltimore you've also got VZ DSL (slightly worse deal than Xohm), Comcast cable and Believe Wireless. Though at the price Xohm is offering, Cable is much more expensive, DSL is a little slower and Believe is more expensive for a comparable connection.

In short, sounds like a winner, especially when the combo rA\WiMax card comes out and service comes to more place.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

One more thing: Xohm sounds like it'd be faster than your average hotspot, which might have a T1 going to it. I'll take 4/2 over 1.3/1.2 or so any day



kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

reply to iansltx

said by iansltx:

But having cable-speed upstream and
It's a LOT FASTER than your average 512k cable upstream.

decent downstream speeds for $35 or less per month...that's just great. If it was in my area, and the caps were good, I'd switch over.
I agree. The day TWCNYC enables capping and my reseller (NYCT) follows it I will drop them immediately and if there's still no FIOS then I'll go for the cheapest home broadband w/ satellite (or perhaps no premium TV at all).
--
[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true. Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.
[/BQUOTE]

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Cable upstream here is 1 or 2 Mbps. I know that it's much worse elsewhere...


PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

reply to tmc8080

said by tmc8080:

unless your "mobile" and traveling somewhere... a simple wifi hotspot will do nicely and much more inexpensively, possibly free!
Yea, but most people don't live in a walk-up flat over a Starbucks. Maybe you do, but most don't.

Thursday, 31-May 21:04:00 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics