<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Fun with numbers in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21197419</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:17:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:17:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Fun with numbers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21199478</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"> In the Vermont deal, FairPoint took over 99 telephone exchanges. The 51 exchanges that will see 100 percent coverage within the next two years are located in all 14 counties. </div>Perhaps I'm being overly optimistic but the way I read that statement is: <b>all customers served by those 51 Central Offices will be able to get DSL by end of 2010.</b><br><br>I can't believe only 48 Vermont Central Offices are currently equipped for DSL. I assume some of these 51 Central Offices support DSL but not remote terminals needed to serve distant customers. But that is just a guess on my part.<br><br>/tom]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21199478</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:23:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fun with numbers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21197419</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/540297"><b>Mactron</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  pnh102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><small>It takes a little more than some CO upgrades to provide DSL service to every customer serviced by a particular CO.  If there are issues with the wiring (fiber, load coils, bad wiring, etc.) between a CO and a given structure in the service area than that structure will not be able to get DSL.</small><br> </div>True, but without the CO upgrades no one gets anything. Need to start somewhere.  :) We'll see how they do.<br><small>--<br><b><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/6s79zx">If only the Verizon CSRs worked  this well.</b> ;)</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21197419</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:55:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fun with numbers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21197242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  knightmb <A HREF="/useremail/u/906493"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>51 of 99? So what they are saying really is they only will provide broadband to 50% of the total exchanges. </div>It takes a little more than some CO upgrades to provide DSL service to every customer serviced by a particular CO.  If there are issues with the wiring (fiber, load coils, bad wiring, etc.) between a CO and a given structure in the service area than that structure will not be able to get DSL.<br><small>--<br>"At the moment of conception."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21197242</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:15:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Fun with numbers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21197141</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/906493"><b>knightmb</b></A> : 51 of 99? So what they are saying really is they only will provide broadband to 50% of the total exchanges. It sounds much better than to say "We'll provide 100% coverage, then in small to print, to a few places".<br><br>I should use the same statement for myself.<br><br>"I provide Tennessee with 100% Wireless Broadband Coverage to 1 out the 347 cities in the state."  :D<br><small>--<br>Fight NebuAD and the like:<br><A HREF="http://wanip.org/anti-nebuad/">Click Here to pollute their data</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21197141</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:46:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
