<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Good idea&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209345</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:45:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:45:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21212512</link>
<description><![CDATA[El Gaupo posted : You hit the nail on the head,they are just resellers.Why buy from a reseller when you can get it without them stuck in the middle]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21212512</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:50:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21210033</link>
<description><![CDATA[funchords posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by jt4 :</small><br><br>comcast put over a billion dollars for clearwire<br> </div>Less than two weeks of revenue, less than one percent of total assets.  <br><br>Of course, Comcast likes to degrade and block anything less than 1 percent.  (snark, snark)  :) :D :o ;) :p<br><small>--<br>Robb Topolski -= <A HREF="http://funchords.com/">funchords.com</a> =- Hillsboro, Oregon<br>More features, more fun, <i><A HREF="/join/new/">Join BroadbandReports.com</a></i>, it's free... <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21210033</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:46:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209848</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : comcast put over a billion dollars for clearwire]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209848</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:11:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209723</link>
<description><![CDATA[openbox9 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>Imagine grabbing your WiMAX laptop or phone handset and seamlessly going from home to the store, the mall, etc. While you can do that now with HSDPA/EVDO, the speeds and latency are terrible. WiMAX would allow any handset manufacturer to include a VoIP app for instance ...</div>If I'm driving to the store or mall, I won't be seamlessly using a laptop. As for my phone handset, I can already do that with my cellphone. Just as I don't see the huge draw of cellular femtocells in residences, I don't see WiMax femtocells being a huge necessity. Maybe I'll be wrong, or maybe I'm misunderstanding how Comcast (and other providers) are planning to employ femtocell technology.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209723</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:39:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209654</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/939879" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=939879');">openbox9</a>:</small><br><br>I don't get it. How can Comcast deploy a mobile wireless solution without significant investment? Placing micro-POPs in customers' homes doesn't make a wireless network, especially if they're relying on residential capped service as the backhaul.<br> </div>They invested heavily in Clearwire, this is just the first fruits of that investment to come out of the planning stages. They will resell Clearwire/Xohm service, which is mobile WiMAX ....<br><br>Imagine grabbing your WiMAX laptop or phone handset and seamlessly going from home to the store, the mall, etc. While you can do that now with HSDPA/EVDO, the speeds and latency are terrible. WiMAX would allow any handset manufacturer to include a VoIP app for instance ...<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/">Linux Haters Unite!</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209654</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:24:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209492</link>
<description><![CDATA[openbox9 posted : I don't get it. How can Comcast deploy a mobile wireless solution without significant investment? Placing micro-POPs in customers' homes doesn't make a wireless network, especially if they're relying on residential capped service as the backhaul.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-idea-21209492</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:54:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Good idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Good-idea-21209345</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : This is a great move for Comcast (and Time Warner who will likely follow suit soon) ... now they have a wireless option to offer. They can do voice and/or data wirelessly without having to invest billions building out a national network like Verizon and AT&T ... or implementing a hackneyed WiFi solution like Cablevision.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/">Linux Haters Unite!</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Good-idea-21209345</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:15:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

