republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast Cable TV » Wasteful Channel Lineup means fewer HD Channels?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
HD »
« comcast remote  
AuthorAll Replies
-


MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal

reply to spfaff
Re: Wasteful Channel Lineup means fewer HD Channels?

2008 CED Fre···hart.pdf
2008 CED Freq Chart
said by spfaff :

750/6 = 125 and 860/6 = ~143,... what happened to the remaining 8 slots each ?
Check the included list for a standard "slot" layout with frequencies.

There are gaps in the slot arrangement to make room for certain other users.
--
Don't mind me, I'm just trying to help...


cypherstream
Looking forward to the future of things.
Premium,MVM
join:2004-12-02
Reading, PA
clubs:
reply to spfaff
Subtract 54 first. The first 54 MHz is the return path.

750-54 = 696.
696 / 6 = 116. There's no issues putting at least one or two channels over, so add one for 117. (Don't add 2 because ch 1 doesn't count).


spfaff

@comcast.net

reply to cypherstream
said by cypherstream See Profile :

I'm going to try to use the term Slots instead of channels to try not to get confused. A slot is this description is a 6 MHz wide "RF Channel".

In a 750 MHz system there are 117 "Slots".
In an 860 MHz system there are 135 "Slots".

750/6 = 125 and 860/6 = ~143,... what happened to the
remaining 8 slots each ?

bicker

join:2007-05-10
Burlington, MA

reply to cypherstream
"What he said."

said by keithbart See Profile :

You said "they can fit 10 or more ADS channels on one channel". If a system like mine uses
ADS does that mean we should have room for more HD channels.
Only after they get rid of analog service entirely. You might have digital service, but your neighbor may be relying on analog service, so those analog "slots" won't be freed up until your neighbor gets shafted. :-\


cypherstream
Looking forward to the future of things.
Premium,MVM
join:2004-12-02
Reading, PA
clubs:


4 edits
reply to keithbart
I'm going to try to use the term Slots instead of channels to try not to get confused. A slot is this description is a 6 MHz wide "RF Channel".

In a 750 MHz system there are 117 "Slots".
In an 860 MHz system there are 135 "Slots".

Each "Slot" a can contain any of the following:

-1 Analog Video Channel
-12 Digital Video Channels (sometimes more with higher compression)
-Up to 3 High Definition Digital Video Channels.
-38.8 mbps data channel.
-Any mixture of Standard digital video channels and 1 or 2 HD digital video channels.

So say you have 70 analog channels in a 750 MHz system, you have exactly 47 free slots to use for digital purposes.

In an ADS system they will duplicate those 70 analog channels in the digital format. For simplicity say they use 10:1 compression for ADS. To carry 70 channels in the digital format you would use 7 Slots used to recreate the analog lineup in the digital domain. Now your down to 40 free slots.

Say your system has 42 HD Channels all on 3:1 compression. That's an additional 14 "slots" used, so now were down to 26 free slots.

Now say your system has 6 Channel slots dedicated to video on demand, and 2 slots dedicated to high speed internet / digital voice. Now your down to 6 available slots. (Some systems get away with 4 VOD channel slots and 1 data channel slot).

At 12:1 compression you now have room for 72 additional digital channels (Premiums, Digital plus, etc..) because 12 * 6 = 72.

750 MHz systems don't give you much room as you can see. Mainly because those 70 Analog channels are taking up a whole lot of space, plus the system amplifiers are poorly designed and can not pass 135 or more channel slots.

So ADS actually takes up room on the system, but it's done for a number of purposes.
-Better picture quality to people using digital boxes.
-Less expensive boxes can be deployed that do not contain any analog tuner.
-DVR's handle all digital signals better. You can store more programming. Some Motorola DVRs were also buggy when recording analog channels.
-Stepping stone to going to an all digital service. People with boxes won't notice a difference because they are already tuned to the digital version.
-Easier to place channels in tier, move them around, authorize and deauthorize.

Keep in mind some of those "slots" are unusable. Those who use 104.2 MHz for their OOB "Box communication" channel will not be able to use slot # 97. Some area's might have noise issues on certain frequencies close to radio stations and broadcast towers. Some trouble channels are 95,96,97,17,18,19,20. A GOOD system however will be tight against "ingress" and not run into that problem. On the contrary some 750 MHz systems will not have an issue broadcasting up to 121 "slots" instead of the normal 117.

keithbart

join:2007-01-01
South Bend, IN

reply to bicker
said by bicker See Profile :

It allows them to graphically present related channels together in the channel line-up. Again, no waste of resources. All that is "used up" is a number, and they have a minimum of 999 numbers to work with, so until they fill up all 999 slots, putting the same stream on two "channels" costs nothing.

It should be noted that often you will find some channels broadcast as analog (for customers with analog service) and ADS (analog digital simulcast, for customers with digital service). That's another matter, and the incremental "waste" of bandwidth is only 1/10th of what it seems, if even that, since they can fit 10 or more ADS "channels" on one channel. However, it isn't even "waste" since the two different customer-bases have specific needs, and or gain specific benefits, that call for the channels to be presented in the specific format intended for them.
bicker, I'm confused. You said "they can fit 10 or more ADS channels on one channel". If a system like mine uses
ADS does that mean we should have room for more HD channels.
Is this the same as analog migration?

bicker

join:2007-05-10
Burlington, MA

reply to IPPlanMan
It allows them to graphically present related channels together in the channel line-up. Again, no waste of resources. All that is "used up" is a number, and they have a minimum of 999 numbers to work with, so until they fill up all 999 slots, putting the same stream on two "channels" costs nothing.

It should be noted that often you will find some channels broadcast as analog (for customers with analog service) and ADS (analog digital simulcast, for customers with digital service). That's another matter, and the incremental "waste" of bandwidth is only 1/10th of what it seems, if even that, since they can fit 10 or more ADS "channels" on one channel. However, it isn't even "waste" since the two different customer-bases have specific needs, and or gain specific benefits, that call for the channels to be presented in the specific format intended for them.
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast Cable TVHD »
« comcast remote  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 07:33:42 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [60] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [48] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [36] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [26] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [4] Monday Evening Links
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Why is VoIP Better than POTS? [VOIP Tech Chat]