<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>A replacement for Sneaker Net? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21214863</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:26:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:26:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>A replacement for Sneaker Net?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214863</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1122567"><b>Noah Vail</b></A> : 100 gigahertz is good for what, 6 feet?  At that wavelength, the particles in the air would be enough to attenuate the signal.  If you put enough wattage behind the signal to get it where you want it, it seems like you'd end up cooking anything near the tower.<br><br>NV<br><small>--<br>Abortion: A Republican Plot to Thin the Liberal Herd.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214863</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:01:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
