<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Great in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21220151</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:30:13 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:30:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Great</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21220151</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  buzz_4_20 <A HREF="/useremail/u/877307"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Fiber requires a lot of infrastructure investment. New DSL tech only requires equipment upgrades. <br> </div>Obviously they figure an investment in fiber is better than more investment in copper.<br><br>Otherwise ADSL2plus would be more prevalent in the US.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21220151</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:16:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Great</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214618</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/877307"><b>buzz_4_20</b></A> : Fiber requires a lot of infrastructure investment. New DSL tech only requires equipment upgrades. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214618</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:39:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Great</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214605</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  buzz_4_20 <A HREF="/useremail/u/877307"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Why don't we work on getting wired speed greater than 3megs at say some random distance like 18,000 feet.<br> </div>It's already there, through fiber.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214605</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:36:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>That&#x27;s Great</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214592</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/877307"><b>buzz_4_20</b></A> : Why don't we work on getting wired speed greater than 3megs at say some random distance like 18,000 feet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21214592</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:32:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
