<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Sketchy&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223484</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:10:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:10:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21227915</link>
<description><![CDATA[tapeloop posted : Is too! :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21227915</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:21:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21227637</link>
<description><![CDATA[quatrix posted : Please stop calling people stupid names when you don't agree with their opinions.  People who throw around the word "troll" are worse than the ones they're accusing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21227637</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:16:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21225021</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : When there was no 'law', AT&T essentially allowed it.  Typically AT&T and many others tend to blanket cover themselves (i.e. 'anything other than WAP / MMS / SMS covered by  MEdia Net is forbidden, such as VoIP, p2p, or anything 'we' deem bad'.  <br>This is something that I would have expected out of AT&T.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21225021</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:55:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224445</link>
<description><![CDATA[wierdo posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1173383" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1173383');">ptrowski</a>:</small><br><br>I tried to search about what the terms were, but there is no way to tell if the terms were changed or not.<br> </div>at&t is one of the few who has the policy of notification before any change in terms. If they don't notify you, your terms didn't change, even if new signups have different terms under which they get service.<br><br>Contrast this with Sprint, who not only doesn't require notification, only posting on their website, but if you use the phone after they post the new terms on the website, you've accepted whatever they decided to put in there without telling you.<br><br>On the bright side with them, at least the terms are easier to find. You're not stuck digging through your closet looking for the contract you signed.<br><br>One thing that does annoy me about at&t is that they don't have a policy of sending you a paper copy of the terms under which a particular feature operates when you sign up over the phone. You do in store (on the rare occasion that reps actually give you all the paperwork they're supposed to), but on the phone, you're pretty much out of luck unless you think to ask, and even then I don't know that they can mail you a copy.<br><small>--<br>It's w<i>ie</i>rdo, not w<i>ei</i>rdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224445</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:00:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224392</link>
<description><![CDATA[tapeloop posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/679831" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=679831');">fancydancer</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/320321" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=320321');">Maccawolf</a>:</small><br><br>while I personally agree with you, the law is <br>"ignorance is no excuse of the law"<br></div>I agree with your quote, but if ATT omitted to say it was allowed or prohibited, then it is not a "law"<br> </div>True.  And even if it <i>were</i> explicitly stated, it would be a "Term of Service," not a law.  But I'm splitting hairs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224392</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:49:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224229</link>
<description><![CDATA[fancydancer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/320321" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=320321');">Maccawolf</a>:</small><br><br>while I personally agree with you, the law is <br>"ignorance is no excuse of the law"<br></div>I agree with your quote, but if ATT omitted to say it was allowed or prohibited, then it is not a "law"<br><small>--<br>Thank you for keeping this a work-free environment!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224229</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:18:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224139</link>
<description><![CDATA[Enlightener posted : Please stop feeding the troll.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224139</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:03:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224114</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/320321" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=320321');">Maccawolf</a>:</small><br><br>BTW, you know what happens when you ASSUME, don't you?<br> </div>You get hit with a higher rate?   :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224114</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:57:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224104</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : I tried to search about what the terms were, but there is no way to tell if the terms were changed or not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224104</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:56:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224101</link>
<description><![CDATA[Maccawolf posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/297537" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=297537');">en102</a>:</small><br><br>Exactly.  It wasn't part of the terms mentioned as acceptable OR prohibited.  Since it wasn't mentioned at all, one would assume that it is ok.<br> </div>while I personally agree with you, the law is <br>"ignorance is no excuse of the law"<br><br>BTW, you know what happens when you ASSUME, don't you?<br><small>--<br><br>Mom and Crockett...... I miss you both!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224101</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:56:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224057</link>
<description><![CDATA[wierdo posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1173383" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1173383');">ptrowski</a>:</small><br><br>Plus knowing AT&T, if it was strictly prohibited they would sock people with charges instead of just change the plan.<br> </div>You can only know them by their written policies, which don't allow for any penalty for misuse of a data plan except removal of that plan. They can't add a different plan or add a different feature (like pay-per-use data) and remain within their written policies.<br><small>--<br>It's w<i>ie</i>rdo, not w<i>ei</i>rdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224057</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:48:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224041</link>
<description><![CDATA[wierdo posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1173383" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1173383');">ptrowski</a>:</small><br><br>People used it within the terms that AT&T set.  Hardly sketchy.<br> </div>Or not. Unless at&t is stupid, which is quite possible. They've had no-tethering terms on the postpaid MEdiaNet Unlimited plans for several years now. (either '04 or '05) They made the mistake of not having those terms (or international data roaming fees) in their original MEdia Works Unlimited plans.<br><br>Surely they remembered to put the same clause in the prepaid version of the data plan.<br><br>Of course, I'm a hypocrite. I don't have those terms, and if I did, I wouldn't pay attention to them.<br><small>--<br>It's w<i>ie</i>rdo, not w<i>ei</i>rdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21224041</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:47:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223979</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : Ok, this is fun.  <br>My point is saying it is "sktechy" without showing "why" you think it is sketchy is silly.<br><br>Plus knowing AT&T, if it was strictly prohibited they would sock people with charges instead of just change the plan.<br><small>--<br>"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."<br><br>Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.venganza.org" >www.venganza.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223979</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:36:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223961</link>
<description><![CDATA[ninjatutle posted : Who says it wasn't?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223961</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:33:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223951</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1308792" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1308792');">ninjatutle</a>:</small><br><br>Who says it wasn't prohibited?<br> </div>Who said it was?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223951</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:32:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223947</link>
<description><![CDATA[ninjatutle posted : Who says it wasn't prohibited?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223947</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:31:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223933</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/297537" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=297537');">en102</a>:</small><br><br>Exactly.  It wasn't part of the terms mentioned as acceptable OR prohibited.  Since it wasn't mentioned at all, one would assume that it is ok.<br> </div>Bingo!<br><small>--<br>"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."<br><br>Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.venganza.org" >www.venganza.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223933</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:28:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223806</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : Exactly.  It wasn't part of the terms mentioned as acceptable OR prohibited.  Since it wasn't mentioned at all, one would assume that it is ok.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223806</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:06:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223787</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1308792" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1308792');">ninjatutle</a>:</small><br><br>It was sketch because tethering was not apart of the terms. I looked into it at the time and figured it would be shut down at any time so I didn't pay the early term to do this. I would have ended up with more money in my pocket each month.<br> </div>Since it was not a part of the terms I would not call it sketchy.  It was not prohibited.<br><small>--<br>"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."<br><br>Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.venganza.org" >www.venganza.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223787</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:03:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223657</link>
<description><![CDATA[ninjatutle posted : It was sketch because tethering was not apart of the terms. I looked into it at the time and figured it would be shut down at any time so I didn't pay the early term to do this. I would have ended up with more money in my pocket each month.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223657</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:40:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223530</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1308792" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1308792');">ninjatutle</a>:</small><br><br>It was sketchy to start with. I remember the article and tutorial showing you how to teather go-phone 3G data + laptop for only $20/month. I thought about going this route since I pay $60/mo for a 3G laptop card. It was a work around and the people knew they were doing some sketch stuff.<br> </div>People used it within the terms that AT&T set.  Hardly sketchy.<br><small>--<br>"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."<br><br>Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.venganza.org" >www.venganza.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Sketchy-21223530</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:18:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sketchy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Sketchy-21223484</link>
<description><![CDATA[ninjatutle posted : It was sketchy to start with. I remember the article and tutorial showing you how to tether go-phone 3G data + laptop for only $20/month. I thought about going this route since I pay $60/mo for a 3G laptop card. It was a work around and the people knew they were doing some sketch stuff.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Sketchy-21223484</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:09:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

