| reply to ptrowski
Re: Sketchy It was sketch because tethering was not apart of the terms. I looked into it at the time and figured it would be shut down at any time so I didn't pay the early term to do this. I would have ended up with more money in my pocket each month. |
|
|
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
 ·VOIPo
| said by ninjatutle:It was sketch because tethering was not apart of the terms. I looked into it at the time and figured it would be shut down at any time so I didn't pay the early term to do this. I would have ended up with more money in my pocket each month. Since it was not a part of the terms I would not call it sketchy. It was not prohibited.
--
"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Exactly. It wasn't part of the terms mentioned as acceptable OR prohibited. Since it wasn't mentioned at all, one would assume that it is ok.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| said by en102:Exactly. It wasn't part of the terms mentioned as acceptable OR prohibited. Since it wasn't mentioned at all, one would assume that it is ok. Bingo!
--
"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
| Who says it wasn't prohibited? |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 | Who said it was? |
|
| Who says it wasn't? |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| Ok, this is fun.
My point is saying it is "sktechy" without showing "why" you think it is sketchy is silly.
Plus knowing AT&T, if it was strictly prohibited they would sock people with charges instead of just change the plan.
--
"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
wierdo
join:2001-02-16
Tulsa, OK Reviews:
 ·Cox HSI
 ·T-Mobile US
| said by ptrowski:Plus knowing AT&T, if it was strictly prohibited they would sock people with charges instead of just change the plan. You can only know them by their written policies, which don't allow for any penalty for misuse of a data plan except removal of that plan. They can't add a different plan or add a different feature (like pay-per-use data) and remain within their written policies.
--
It's wierdo, not weirdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word.  |
|
 MaccawolfPremium
join:2001-02-20
Hillsdale, NJ
kudos:6 | reply to en102
said by en102:Exactly. It wasn't part of the terms mentioned as acceptable OR prohibited. Since it wasn't mentioned at all, one would assume that it is ok. while I personally agree with you, the law is
"ignorance is no excuse of the law"
BTW, you know what happens when you ASSUME, don't you?
--
Mom and Crockett...... I miss you both! |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| said by Maccawolf:BTW, you know what happens when you ASSUME, don't you? You get hit with a higher rate?  |
|
| reply to ptrowski
Please stop feeding the troll. |
|
 fancydancerPerception is realityPremium
join:2002-08-28
Springfield, IL | reply to Maccawolf
said by Maccawolf:while I personally agree with you, the law is "ignorance is no excuse of the law" I agree with your quote, but if ATT omitted to say it was allowed or prohibited, then it is not a "law"
--
Thank you for keeping this a work-free environment! |
|
 tapeloopNot bad at all, really.Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One
kudos:1 | said by fancydancer:said by Maccawolf:while I personally agree with you, the law is "ignorance is no excuse of the law" I agree with your quote, but if ATT omitted to say it was allowed or prohibited, then it is not a "law" True. And even if it were explicitly stated, it would be a "Term of Service," not a law. But I'm splitting hairs. |
|
en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to Maccawolf
When there was no 'law', AT&T essentially allowed it. Typically AT&T and many others tend to blanket cover themselves (i.e. 'anything other than WAP / MMS / SMS covered by MEdia Net is forbidden, such as VoIP, p2p, or anything 'we' deem bad'.
This is something that I would have expected out of AT&T.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
quatrixPremium
join:2005-02-11
Davie, FL
kudos:2 | reply to Enlightener
Please stop calling people stupid names when you don't agree with their opinions. People who throw around the word "troll" are worse than the ones they're accusing. |
|
tapeloopNot bad at all, really.Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One
kudos:1 | reply to ptrowski
Is too!  |
|
