 Fubar
join:2001-02-20
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:2
1 edit | reply to funchords
Re: Hey Comcast!???! This is backbone... Not Fios or anything else last mile... |
|
| said by Fubar:This is backbone... Not Fios or anything else last mile... And it also gives the lie to those claiming there is no backbone bandwidth crunch. Both Verizon & Level 3 and independent vendors proclaiming the problems with backbone traffic. »www.lightreading.com/document.as···d=165279
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
 DogfatherPremium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA | Just shows there is no backbone bandwidth "crunch". Both Level 3 and Verizon are easily handling the current traffic and looking ahead to an exponential increase in capacity. |
|
Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
3 edits | reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:said by Fubar:This is backbone... Not Fios or anything else last mile... And it also gives the lie to those claiming there is no backbone bandwidth crunch. Both Verizon & Level 3 and independent vendors proclaiming the problems with backbone traffic. » www.lightreading.com/document.as···d=165279 Absolutely false.
"Level 3 has engineered the network carefully. We have high margins and our IP related revenue continues to grow. It is a good business for us and one we remain committed to"
those margins are not easy to come by, but from most educated guesses I have seen are anywhere from 1500 - 10,000%, not to shabby.
Also Level 3 has fiber that is not even turned on yet with no ip infrastructure around it yet.
From the leading national expert, as quoted on our site here:
»Deconstructing The Exaflood Myth |
|
DogfatherPremium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
1 edit | Expert was a little understated. In case anyone was wondering, that quote was from Mark Taylor, director of IP Services for Level 3 in Europe. I'm fairly certainly he is familiar with Level 3's capacity  |
|
| Thanks clarifying that quote. I forgot to put the source.
Data |
|
 espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
 ·Clear Wireless
| reply to DataRiker
said by DataRiker:those margins are not easy to come by, but from most educated guesses I have seen are anywhere from 1500 - 10,000%, not to shabby. »finance.google.com/finance?q=lvlt
How can you have a 1500-10,000% margin on bandwidth and end up with a negative profit margin? |
|
| said by espaeth:said by DataRiker:those margins are not easy to come by, but from most educated guesses I have seen are anywhere from 1500 - 10,000%, not to shabby. » finance.google.com/finance?q=lvltHow can you have a 1500-10,000% margin on bandwidth and end up with a negative profit margin? You can't. But then you live in the real world with the rest of us.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
|
|
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
4 edits | reply to espaeth
How can you have a 1500-10,000% margin on bandwidth and end up with a negative profit margin?
Spend more money than you earn? Bad management / and or investments? Have you been paying attention to the US news lately.
For being a self proclaimed rich investment type, you don't know much about business. |
|
espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
1 edit | said by DataRiker:For being a self proclaimed rich investment type, you don't know much about business. According to Level(3)'s own presentations their gross profit margin is between 55-60%.
Source: »files.shareholder.com/downloads/···2008.pdf
I agree that your argument is much more compelling if you just pull numbers out of your ass though. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:And it also gives the lie to those claiming there is no backbone bandwidth crunch. That's not necessarily an indication of a bandwidth crunch. It is good planning. It appears that Verizon is putting bandwidth in place to deal with an all IP future where telephone, SDTV and HDTV all ride the same network as traditional data. Now that Verizon has gotten into the content business with FiosTV, they have to contend with distribution of live and on-demand video content from national super-headends.
Capacity problems, no. Future proofing, yes.
Providers like Verizon aren't fly by night operations where they let circuits run at near capacity.
--
---
Drilling for more oil is akin to giving a methhead the keys to the meth lab. |
|
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
4 edits | reply to espaeth
This says nothing about the margins on Bandwidth. Nice try though. You won't find it easily, since its a nasty little secret. I'm not worried because you won't find a credible source that says otherwise.
If I'm not mistaken Cogent's modest take was stated at 1500% on this site before, and they are the bottom of the barrel when it comes to cost, so I imagine that 10,000% would not be out of line for Level 3 comm.
By far the highest expense (besides the initial fiber) is exchanges brokered with other backbone carriers, and these were kept quiet until the age of Cogent, who undercut other providers, something like 1/5th the price. I guess your probably right and cogent just found some "cheap photons"...
As for making up numbers, these are what I have taken just from my limited reading on the subject, and there is not much. I am not an expert by any means, but this is what I have seen quoted before.
Having said that, I know there is only an indirect link between the profit margin of bandwidth on fiber lines a companies gross profit. Level 3 is subject to Wall St. and that means at this point you basically means a companies books mean N O T H I N G. High profits one day, and 70 billion dollars in dept the next. |
|
 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online
| reply to DataRiker
said by DataRiker:How can you have a 1500-10,000% margin on bandwidth and end up with a negative profit margin? Spend more money than you earn? Bad management / and or investments? Have you been paying attention to the US news lately. Yeah, try being a customer. Network is great. The rest is a total mess. Their management is terrible, the buying sprees they went on made the mess worse. |
|
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to NetAdmin1
said by NetAdmin1:said by fAcEtIOUs:And it also gives the lie to those claiming there is no backbone bandwidth crunch. That's not necessarily an indication of a bandwidth crunch. It is good planning. It appears that Verizon is putting bandwidth in place to deal with an all IP future where telephone, SDTV and HDTV all ride the same network as traditional data. Now that Verizon has gotten into the content business with FiosTV, they have to contend with distribution of live and on-demand video content from national super-headends. Capacity problems, no. Future proofing, yes. Providers like Verizon aren't fly by night operations where they let circuits run at near capacity. Well stated. My thoughts exactly, but I no longer bother with the technical corrections of TK's posts. Its a full time job. |
|
 53059959Temp banned from BBR more then anyone
join:2002-10-02
PwnZone | reply to Dogfather
I have to agree, comcast is just cheap. Their backbone has terrible peering, forcing me to go across the country just to come back to the same city. |
|
