republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

reply to Matt

Re: Ummm, what?

said by Matt:

said by Article :

As a result, the white spaces devices naturally could not detect the microphone signals, as they were hidden by the much more powerful TV signals.
So, if the microphones were transmitting on top of active, powerful TV signals ... why in the hell were the whitespace devices transmitting there too? Shouldn't they have avoided the frequencies altogether since there were TV signals present?

Am I misunderstanding something? (Which is entirely possible.)
Sounds like something is misunderstood somewhere.

Part of the problem seems to be the multiple uses of the word, "broadcasters." In some cases, they might be talking about the transmitters of a TV signal, in other cases they're talking about the production crew trying to cover the event (the broadcasters using wireless microphones). But even with that understanding, I can't parse it.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More features, more fun, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...

Wednesday, 30-May 11:46:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics