<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Qualcomm making it easier in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21246451</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:35:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:35:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Qualcomm making it easier</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21250584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  xenophon <A HREF="/useremail/u/1487606"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Qualcomm is making it easier as they will be coming out with CDMA/LTE (and HSPA?) chipsets and base station cards.  It may just be a card upgrade in the cellsites rather than a forklift upgrade.<br><br>If it turns out to be relatively cheap and easy to migrate CDMA to LTE, don't be surprised if Sprint also goes LTE in 5-7 years or so when Verizon does.  Sprint will probably be owned by someone else by then anyway to help fund the upgrade.<br><br>WiMAX could become their consumer products wireless division and LTE becomes the cellphone division.  Just speculating...<br> </div>Qualcomm got their patents into UTMS/HSDPA, so why do they need their proprietary CDMA standard to make them money? They just sit back and watch the $ roll in.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21250584</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:15:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qualcomm making it easier</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21248054</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Actually it is kinda.  We are talking about the Inukshuk network jointly owned by Bell/Rogers. It is pre-WiMAX but really it is more or less exactly the same as the ratified fixed WiMAX standard.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21248054</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:20:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qualcomm making it easier</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21248052</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/248514"><b>mlerner</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Deadpool <A HREF="/useremail/u/356677"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  brad <A HREF="/useremail/u/1484420"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Rogers (GSM) does actually sell WiMAX wireless service as well  :)<br> </div>Bell has the exact same service offering, but to be clear it is NOT WiMAX.<br> </div>Huh? It's ClearWire's WiMax technology they're using.<br><br>In fact, on the biz side it's promoted as 'WiMax in Home', for example.<br><br>So, how is it NOT WiMax?<br> </div>It is based on pre-wimax standards but it is in fact a proprietary wireless protocol.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21248052</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:19:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qualcomm making it easier</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21247892</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356677"><b>Deadpool</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  brad <A HREF="/useremail/u/1484420"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Rogers (GSM) does actually sell WiMAX wireless service as well  :)<br> </div>Bell has the exact same service offering, but to be clear it is NOT WiMAX.<br> </div>Huh? It's ClearWire's WiMax technology they're using.<br><br>In fact, on the biz side it's promoted as 'WiMax in Home', for example.<br><br>So, how is it NOT WiMax?<br><small>--<br>Disclaimer: If I express an opinion, it is my own opinion, not that of Bell or its related companies.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21247892</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:44:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qualcomm making it easier</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21246978</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1484420"><b>brad</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Rogers (GSM) does actually sell WiMAX wireless service as well  :)<br> </div>Bell has the exact same service offering, but to be clear it is NOT WiMAX.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21246978</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:37:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qualcomm making it easier</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21246931</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : I think there's a lot of money to be made during the 2010 Olympics (international roaming) that Bell/Telus have been currently losing to Rogers.  Rogers (GSM) does actually sell WiMAX wireless service as well  :)<br>I suspect there will be different overall uses for WiMAX and LTE though.<br>WiMAX may end up more in various devices, I suspect a lot of 'non retail' devices, but more industrial or b2b in addition to many niche products.  HSPA/LTE are too tied into the old corp mobile industry at the retail level for handsets.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21246931</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:31:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Qualcomm making it easier</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21246451</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1487606"><b>xenophon</b></A> : Qualcomm is making it easier as they will be coming out with CDMA/LTE (and HSPA?) chipsets and base station cards.  It may just be a card upgrade in the cellsites rather than a forklift upgrade.<br><br>If it turns out to be relatively cheap and easy to migrate CDMA to LTE, don't be surprised if Sprint also goes LTE in 5-7 years or so when Verizon does.  Sprint will probably be owned by someone else by then anyway to help fund the upgrade.<br><br>WiMAX could become their consumer products wireless division and LTE becomes the cellphone division.  Just speculating...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21246451</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:05:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
