how-to block ads
|
dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
1 edit | reply to uswc
Re: VDSL
Stupid it is then.
You're arguing that USW benefitted from being bought out by the corrupt paper tiger known as Qwest because they weren't quite as corrupt as Global Crossing??? Ridiculous.
USW would've been far, far better off had no merger taken place at all, or if it merged with a company that had actually made a dime of real profit in it's existance. One who's stock price didn't rely on corporate fraud. There's no disputing that the merger kept pre-merger Qwest alive and badly damaged pre-merger US West.
Had investors known that Qwest was little short of a giant Ponzi scheme designed to bilk investors and enrich Joe, they would've gone bankrupt far before they had a chance to buy Qwest.
It wasn't a merger of equals. It was a merger of a bank robber using his proceeds to buy another bank such that he might more easily rob that one too. | |
USWC
@iauq.com
| Wow…They must not teach manners up in fly over country. I guess it’s pretty easy to call someone stupid on the internet… Oh wait; you must be one of those USW employees that lost the farm on the Qwest merger… I suppose you should have sold when the stock was high (now who is stupid!). Funny how USW was “carrying” classic Qwest, only to be carried by the original Qwest now that local access lines are going away. I suppose I should spell out my thoughts, since you cannot seem to understand the general gist of the post. The original post balked at the amount of entitlement given to current and former CEOs of Qwest. And, was generally down on the state of the company, with how it squandered its legacy. (Which by the way, is not un-usual in corporate America)
My point; USW would’ve been bought period... It was just a question of whom; Global Crossing or Qwest. Qwest bought the company, and yes USW did carry Qwest for a couple of years. But, had Qwest not purchased USW, USW would’ve been bought by Global Crossing (hopefully you are aware of what happened to them). Now, let’s say hypothetically that USW would’ve remained independent. Since 2000 USW has been losing around 1 million access lines per year (Life Bitter Here, US Worst). At the time of the merger there were 16 million +/- access lines. Now USW has a business model that is no longer sustainable (and was not sustainable at the time of the merger). USW did not have a nationwide wireless network and certainly did not have the funds to build out the existing infrastructure. So either way, you would have lost a fortune on USW, it was just a question of when. Yes the company was extremely innovative, but could not execute a plan. Just look at how poorly Choice TV was implemented. How about when the company decentralized complex operations, only to re-centralize them again? My point is this, what has happened, happened. If you lost a ton on what happened, then you should have had the foresight to look beyond what the company was saying and should have diversified your 401K (oh wait USW would not let you do that). If you’re still upset, then you have a fragile and meaning less existence…And need to learn to move on.
But, I suppose it’s just easier to call someone stupid and remain bitter! | |
MyChoiceTV
@qwest.net |  I will miss my choice tv it worked great! It was quite price competitive and it was MPEG3 before MPEG1 was cool.
-I am looking forward to a DVR though.|:) | |
-
|
