  GOLFnSUN Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
4 edits | A report did come out Friday
A report came out Friday. An FCC decision will come out later.
»hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···45A2.pdf
This report tentatively concludes that for the static case that is examined AWS-3 devices could operate at a power level of up to 23 dBm/MHz equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) and with out-of-band emissions (OOBE) attenuated by 60 + 10*log(P) dB without a significant risk of harmful interference. However, this report also notes that the Commission has in the past adopted less stringent OOBE standards under flexible service rules whereby the licensees and industry work together cooperatively to manage potential interference. The report defines what the engineers felt were safe power levels without causing interference. But then says the FCC commissioners in the past have weakened the stds they came up with to make industry happy.
News story here: »www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co···841.html
Devices are capable of accessing the "white spaces" between airwaves without affecting the adjacent licensed networks under certain power-level limits, the FCC concluded in a detailed report released Friday afternoon. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
 RayW Premium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT clubs:
·XMission
| Re: The report did come out Friday
said by GOLFnSUN :» hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···45A2.pdfThis report tentatively concludes that for the static case that is examined AWS-3 devices could operate at a power level of up to 23 dBm/MHz equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) and with out-of-band emissions (OOBE) attenuated by 60 + 10*log(P) dB without a significant risk of harmful interference. However, this report also notes that the Commission has in the past adopted less stringent OOBE standards under flexible service rules whereby the licensees and industry work together cooperatively to manage potential interference. The report defines what the engineers felt were safe power levels without causing interference. But then says the FCC commissioners in the past have weakened the stds they came up with to make industry happy. Ummm...what does this have to do with white space from the reduction in TV guard bands? The referenced article is talking about the 2 GHz band and as far as I know, OTA channel 83 is around 900 MHz and CATV channel 158 is about 1 GHz. -- I am not lost, I find myself every time. |
|
  Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02
Host: Road Runner PC gaming GAMES PC gaming Tech
| reply to GOLFnSUN Different report.
That one the FCC released on Friday has to do with M2Z networks plan to build a national wireless network, and the potential interference claimed by T-Mobile.
That MocoNews report (published by the Washington Post) confuses the two, different wireless concepts. |
|
  GOLFnSUN Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to RayW Re: A report did come out Friday
said by RayW :said by GOLFnSUN :» hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···45A2.pdfThis report tentatively concludes that for the static case that is examined AWS-3 devices could operate at a power level of up to 23 dBm/MHz equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) and with out-of-band emissions (OOBE) attenuated by 60 + 10*log(P) dB without a significant risk of harmful interference. However, this report also notes that the Commission has in the past adopted less stringent OOBE standards under flexible service rules whereby the licensees and industry work together cooperatively to manage potential interference. The report defines what the engineers felt were safe power levels without causing interference. But then says the FCC commissioners in the past have weakened the stds they came up with to make industry happy. Ummm...what does this have to do with white space from the reduction in TV guard bands? The referenced article is talking about the 2 GHz band and as far as I know, OTA channel 83 is around 900 MHz and CATV channel 158 is about 1 GHz. Read the Wash Post news story. »www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co···841.html
Some news outlets were confused as to WHAT was being released Friday, including the Reuters article quoted in the BBR story. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
 RayW Premium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT clubs: | Re: The report did come out Friday
Again...that has nothing to do with the TV spectrum, it is another band altogether with different characteristics.
2 GHz is not the same as sub 1 GHz. -- I am not lost, I find myself every time. |
|
  GOLFnSUN Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
1 edit | Re: A report did come out Friday
said by RayW :Again...that has nothing to do with the TV spectrum, it is another band altogether with different characteristics. 2 GHz is not the same as sub 1 GHz. I think Reuters got confused as to what report was being issued Friday and said a "White Space" report was coming out when it wasn't. Then the Wash Post got the correct report but mis-charcterized it as a White Space report. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
  Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 | Fairly sure the Reuters report is correct, since the White Space results should really be out any day now.
The MocoNews (via Washington Post) piece completely confuses two distinctly different wireless efforts... |
|