unconstitutional - dslreports.com

Forums » FCC's Smut-Free Broadband Plan Goes Forward » unconstitutional


Uniqs: 99	Share Topic:	RSS topic:	toggle: flat / full normal / watch	Post a:	Post a:

Whining »
« The internet is for porn!

dnoyeB Ferrous Phallus join:2000-10-09 Southfield, MI	unconstitutional Of course its unconstitutional. Any private company could do this. The government can not. I expect if a democrat gets in office the FCC is going to loose its head really quick. -- dnoyeB "Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16
	permalink · 2008-10-13 10:50:33 ·

BF69 join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN	Re: unconstitutional said by dnoyeB : Of course its unconstitutional. Any private company could do this. The government can not. I expect if a democrat gets in office the FCC is going to loose its head really quick. How is it unconstituional? Only the FREE access is censored. How is that any different than say PBS not having any smut on it?
	permalink · 2008-10-13 10:53:42 ·

badtrip
East Bay
Premium
join:2004-03-20
Albany, CA

·Unwired Ltd

·Comcast

Re: unconstitutional

said by BF69

How is it unconstituional? Only the FREE access is censored. How is that any different than say PBS not having any smut on it?
[/BQUOTE :

PBS is not run by the government.

Censorship is a slippery slope, however. If this is a US Gvmt project, IMO they should not censor content but instead provide free tools to end users so that parents may control what their children see on the internet. A simple logon page can display the tool's download/implementation information.

permalink · 2008-10-13 15:03:53 · Print ·

your comment..

Forums » FCC's Smut-Free Broadband Plan Goes Forward

Whining »
« The internet is for porn!


Sunday, 29-Nov 06:34:28	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF