unconstitutional in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21258367 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:31:12 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:31:12 EDT Re: unconstitutional http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21259654 badtrip :
said by BF69 See ProfileHow is it unconstituional? Only the FREE access is censored. How is that any different than say PBS not having any smut on it?
[/BQUOTE :

PBS is not run by the government.

Censorship is a slippery slope, however. If this is a US Gvmt project, IMO they should not censor content but instead provide free tools to end users so that parents may control what their children see on the internet. A simple logon page can display the tool's download/implementation information.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21259654 Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:03:53 EDT Re: unconstitutional http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21258384 BF69 :
said by dnoyeB See Profile :

Of course its unconstitutional. Any private company could do this. The government can not. I expect if a democrat gets in office the FCC is going to loose its head really quick.
How is it unconstituional? Only the FREE access is censored. How is that any different than say PBS not having any smut on it?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21258384 Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:53:42 EDT unconstitutional http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21258367 dnoyeB : Of course its unconstitutional. Any private company could do this. The government can not. I expect if a democrat gets in office the FCC is going to loose its head really quick.
--
dnoyeB
"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21258367 Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:50:33 EDT