http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21266707 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:01:12 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:01:12 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21270613
Oh, and I assume you mean 20 Mbps...20 Kbps would have me partying like it's 1999....well more like 1995, but you get the picture. :)
--
"Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too."]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21270613 Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:37:13 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21269174 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21269174 Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:33:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21268602 said by wvcaver:

Why such low upload speed ?
Because they chose the DSL that only do a max of 1024 Kbps on a perfect line.

They can easily offer bonded DSL, but do not.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21268602 Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:48:31 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21267646 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21267646 Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:06:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21267612 said by wvcaver:

Why such low upload speed ?Crosstalk limitations at the central wiring location of the DSLAM. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21267612 Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:02:47 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21267175 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21267175 Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:00:12 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21266791 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21266791 Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:53:29 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21266729 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-896-kbps-21266729 Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:43:59 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/896-kbps-21266707 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/896-kbps-21266707 Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:39:59 EDT