Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » 2008: The Year Broadband Over Powerline Died » So long, see ya later, bye!
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Finally. Thank God. »
« Buh-bye  

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: So long, see ya later, bye!

said by nasadude See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Well the FCC hasn't learned its lesson yet. They pushed BPL despite all the interference complaints and now they are doing the same with the unlicensed white space device push.
initial FIELD trials of prototype equipment seemed to show interference but in reality was the result of faulty FIELD TEST equipment. subsequent re-test shows the equipment works and it looks like the FCC will approve.
The FCC White Space report just released lists all kinds of interference issues. It is just that the backers of white space devices have co-opted Martin to ignore the problems. So, it is no different than the BPL problems. It is just that the backers of White Space devices have more political clout with the FCC than the electric companies pushing BPL had.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

Re: So long, see ya later, bye!

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

The FCC White Space report just released lists all kinds of interference issues. It is just that the backers of white space devices have co-opted Martin to ignore the problems. So, it is no different than the BPL problems. It is just that the backers of White Space devices have more political clout with the FCC than the electric companies pushing BPL had.
The electric companies NEVER pushed BPL. Most of them didn't want to have anything to do with broadband and were only interested in the "reading the meters remotely" aspect. The few that did get involved did so reluctantly and don't seem bothered at all that BPL never went anywhere.

BPL got a BIG push under Powell and Martin kept the ball rolling.

as far as political clout, it's pretty amusing that you believe NAB and ATT are lacking in that area.

I haven't read the report, but if there are "all kinds of interference issues", then why is Martin saying this will get approved? Maybe he doesn't like NAB because of the indecency stuff, although he is pretty much on board with allowing companies to own as many radio and tv stations as they want.
Forums » 2008: The Year Broadband Over Powerline DiedFinally. Thank God. »
« Buh-bye  


Sunday, 29-Nov 20:49:22 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [81] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· stopthetvtax [Canadian Chat]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· question about Asus WL520GU with DD-WRT VOIP Generic [VOIP Tech Chat]